Fors Clavigera (Volume 6 of 8): $b Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great BritainRuskin, John
General
Fors Clavigera (Volume 6 of 8): $b Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great Britain
Ruskin, John
Aesthetics; Conduct of life; Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 19th century; Social problems; Working class -- Great Britain
“Kingswood Lodge, Lee Green, S.E.
“August 7th, 1876.
“My dear Mr. Ruskin,—It may interest your correspondent, ‘A Reader of
Fors,’ and possibly yourself also, to know that interested persons have
altered old John Wesley’s rules to suit modern ideas.
“Rules of the Methodist Societies (Tyerman’s Life and Times of Wesley,
p. 431).
“Rule.—Leader to receive once a week what members are willing to give
towards relief of the poor.
“Altered to ‘support of the Gospel.’
“Going to law forbidden, is altered to ‘brother going to law with
brother.’
“Original Rule.—The giving or taking things on usury, the words have
been added, ‘that is, unlawful interest.’
“Mr. Tyerman remarks, ‘the curious reader will forgive these trifles.’
“I for one do not at all feel disposed to do so.”
(Nor does St. George; nor has he either leave, or hope, to say, “God
forgive them.”)
FORS CLAVIGERA.
LETTER LXX.
I have been not a little pestered this month by the quantities of
letters, which I can’t wholly cure myself of the weakness of reading,
from people who fancy that, like other political writers of the day, I
print, on the most important subjects, the first thing that comes into
my head; and may be made immediately to repent of what I have said, and
generally to see the error of my ways, by the suggestions of their
better judgment.
Letters of this sort do not surprise me if they have a Scottish
postmark, the air of Edinburgh having always had a curiously exciting
quality, and amazing power over weak heads; but one or two
communications from modest and thoughtful English friends have
seriously troubled me by the extreme simplicity of their objections to
statements which, if not acceptable, I had at least hoped would have
been intelligible to them.
I had, indeed, expected difficulty in proving to my readers the
mischievousness of Usury; but I never thought to find confusion in
their minds between Property itself, and its Interest. Yet I find this
singular confusion at the root of the objections made by most of my
cavilling correspondents: “How are we to live” (they say) “if, when we
have saved a hundred pounds, we can’t make a hundred and five of them,
without any more trouble?”
Gentlemen and ladies all,—you are to live on your hundred pounds,
saved; and if you want five pounds more, you must go and work for five
pounds more; just as a man who hasn’t a hundred pounds must work for
the first five he gets.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account