Fort Pulaski National Monument, GeorgiaLattimore, Ralston B.
History
Fort Pulaski National Monument, Georgia
Lattimore, Ralston B.
Fort Pulaski (Ga.) -- Siege, 1862; Fort Pulaski National Monument (Ga.)
On the northwest shore of Tybee Island facing Fort Pulaski these troops
erected 11 batteries for guns and mortars. Their job was made
particularly difficult because the last mile of the shore, on which
seven of the major batteries had to be established, was an open marsh
in full view of the fort and within effective range of its guns. Here
all work was performed at night. The men were not allowed to speak
above a whisper and were guided by the notes of a whistle. Before dawn
each morning evidence of the night’s work was concealed by camouflage.
When the batteries were ready, the guns were hauled across the marsh on
sling carts. These loads were so extraordinarily heavy that it was
often necessary to harness 250 men to a cart. Even on the last night
before the bombardment the work continued. In the flickering light of
lanterns men filled cartridge bags, cut paper fuses, and whittled
wooden fuse plugs.
[Illustration: _Guns were hauled by manpower._ From _Harper’s Pictorial
History of the War of 1861_.]
The final armament comprised 36 pieces placed at various distances from
the fort as shown in the following table:
1. Battery, Stanton, 3 heavy 13-inch Mortars, at 3,400 yds
2. “ Grant, 3 heavy 13-inch Mortars, “ 3,200 “
3. “ Lyon, 3 heavy 10-inch Columbiads, “ 3,100 “
4. “ Lincoln, 3 heavy 8-inch Columbiads, “ 3,045 “
5. “ Burnside, 1 heavy 13-inch Mortar, “ 2,750 “
6. “ Sherman, 3 heavy 13-inch Mortar, “ 2,650 “
7. “ Halleck, 2 heavy 13-inch Mortar, “ 2,400 “
8. “ Scott, 3 10-in. Columbiads, } “ 1,740 “
Scott, 1 8-in. Columbiads, }
9. “ Sigel, 5 30-pdr. Parrott, } “ 1,670 “
Sigel, 1 48-pdr. James, (old 24 pdr.) }
10. “ McClellan, 2 84-pdr. James, (old 42 pdr.) } “ 1,650 “
McClennan, 2 64-pdr. James, (old 32 pdr.) }
11. “ Totten 2 10-inch Siege Mortars, “ 1,650 “
_Eve of Battle_
On March 31, when preparations for the bombardment were almost
complete, General Sherman was relieved of his command, and
responsibility for the campaign in the Department of the South was
turned over to Maj. Gen. David Hunter. While this move undoubtedly led
to greater harmony of action between Army and Navy leaders, Sherman
deserves much of the credit for the successful operations against
Pulaski. Neither General Hunter nor Brig. Gen. Henry W. Benham, whom he
had placed in command of the Northern District of the Department,
suggested a single change in the siege works under construction on
Tybee, and Gillmore was retained to conduct the bombardment. On the
afternoon of April 9, everything was in readiness to open fire. General
orders were issued, the Navy alerted, and the battle set for the
following morning.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account