Forty Centuries of Ink: Or, A chronological narrative concerning ink and its backgrounds, introducing incidental observations and deductions, parallels of time and color phenomena, bibliography, chemistry, poetical effusions, citations, anecdotes and curiosa together with some evidence respecting the evanescent character of most inks of to-day and an epitome of chemico-legal ink.Carvalho, David Nunes
History
Forty Centuries of Ink: Or, A chronological narrative concerning ink and its backgrounds, introducing incidental observations and deductions, parallels of time and color phenomena, bibliography, chemistry, poetical effusions, citations, anecdotes and curiosa together with some evidence respecting the evanescent character of most inks of to-day and an epitome of chemico-legal ink.
Carvalho, David Nunes
Ink
which would have gained the main object in view,
and even as it was there was great delay; but at
last, on the 28th of September, the gift was formally
made, and the MSS. soon after deposited in
St. Petersburg, where it now lies. The date of
this MSS. is supposed to be not later than A. D.
400, and has been the subject of minute inquiry in
consequence of the curious statement of Simonides
in 1862, that he had himself written it on Mount
Athos in 1839-40."
Constantine Simonides was a Greek who was born
in 1824 and is believed to have been the most versatile
forger of the nineteenth century. From 1843
until 1856 he was in evidence all over Europe offering
for sale fraudulent MSS. purporting to be of
ancient origin.
In 1861 Madan says:
"He boldly asserted that he himself had written
the whole of the Codex Sinaiticus which Tischendorf
had bought in 1856 from the monastery of St.
Catherine on Mount Sinai. The statement was, of
course, received with the utmost incredulity; but
Simionides asserted, not only that he had written it,
but that, in view of the probable skepticism of the
scholars, he had placed certain private signs on
particular leaves of the codex. When pressed to
specify these marks he gave a list of the leaves on
which were to be found his initials or other monogram.
The test was a fair one, and the MSS.,
which was at St. Petersburg, was carefully inspected.
Every leaf designated by Simonides was
found to be imperfect at the part where the mark
was to have been found. Deliberate mutilation by
an enemy, said his friends. But many thought that
the wily Greek had acquired through private friends
a note of some imperfect leaves in the MSS., and
had made unscrupulous use of the information."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account