Forty Centuries of Ink: Or, A chronological narrative concerning ink and its backgrounds, introducing incidental observations and deductions, parallels of time and color phenomena, bibliography, chemistry, poetical effusions, citations, anecdotes and curiosa together with some evidence respecting the evanescent character of most inks of to-day and an epitome of chemico-legal ink.Carvalho, David Nunes
History
Forty Centuries of Ink: Or, A chronological narrative concerning ink and its backgrounds, introducing incidental observations and deductions, parallels of time and color phenomena, bibliography, chemistry, poetical effusions, citations, anecdotes and curiosa together with some evidence respecting the evanescent character of most inks of to-day and an epitome of chemico-legal ink.
Carvalho, David Nunes
Ink
"Paper came before its time and had to wait for
recognition. It was sorely needed. The Egyptian
manufacture of papyrus, which was in a state of
decay in the seventh century, ceased entirely in the
ninth or tenth. Not many books were written during
this period, but there was then, and for at least
three centuries afterwards, an unsatisfied demand
for something to write upon. Parchment was so
scarce that reckless copyists frequently resorted to
the desperate expedient of effacing the writing on
old and lightly esteemed manuscripts. It was not
a difficult task. The writing ink then used was
usually made of lamp-black, gum and vinegar; it
it had but a feeble encaustic property, and it did
not bite in or penetrate the parchment. The work
of effacing this ink was accomplished by moistening
the parchment with a weak alkaline solution and
by rubbing it with pumice stone. This treatment
did not entirely obliterate the writing, but made it
so indistinct that the parchment could be written
over the second time. Manuscripts so treated are
now known as palimpsests. All the large European
public libraries have copies of palimpsests, which are
melancholy illustrations of the literary tastes of
many writers or bookmakers during the Middle
Ages. More convincingly than by argument they
show the utility of paper. Manuscripts of the
Gospels, of the Iliad, and of works of the highest
merit, often of great beauty and accuracy, are
dimly seen underneath stupid sermons, and theological
writings of a nature so paltry that no man
living cares to read them. In Some instances the
first writing has been so thoroughly scrubbed out
that its meaning is irretrievably lost.
"Much as paper was needed, it was not at all popular
with copyists; their prejudice was not altogether
unreasonable, for it was thick, coarse, knotty, and
in every way unfitted for the display or ornamental
penmanship or illumination. The cheaper quality,
then known as cotton paper, was especially objectionable.
It seems to have been so badly made as
to need governmental interference. Frederick II,
of Germany, in the year 1221, foreseeing evils
that might arise from bad paper, made a decree by
which he made invalid all public documents that
should be put on cotton paper, and ordered them
within two years to be transcribed upon parchment.
Peter II, of Spain, in the year 1338, publicly
commanded the paper-makers of Valencia and
Xativa to make their paper of a better quality and
equal to that of an earlier period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account