Forty Years at El Paso, 1858-1898Mills, W. W. (William Wallace)
Philosophy
Forty Years at El Paso, 1858-1898
Mills, W. W. (William Wallace)
El Paso (Tex.); Texas -- History
The opponents of Governor Hamilton had the tact to put forward, as their
leader, Col. E. J. Davis, a Texas Union man, who had done good service
during the war, and against whom nothing can be said except that he was
inordinately ambitious, vain, vindictive, and that he was then, and for
years after, surrounded and influenced by as lordly a set of
unscrupulous adventurers as ever tyrannized over or wronged the people
of any Southern State. He and Morgan Hamilton, a brother of Jack
Hamilton, were almost the only leaders of respectability in the whole
“Davis party.”
The three questions upon which the Davis Republicans and the Hamilton
Republicans wrangled so long in that convention were these:
1st. Davis contended that all who had participated in the Rebellion
should be disfranchised. Hamilton opposed.
2d. Davis contended that all laws passed by the Legislature during the
Rebellion were null and void, _ab initio_.
Hamilton contended that only such laws as contravened the Constitution
and laws of the United States were void.
3d. Davis contended for a division of Texas into three States, and
Hamilton opposed.
(The proposition to divide Texas was finally killed on motion of the
writer of these chapters, and if any Texan thinks that the State was not
then in danger of being divided, let him remember old Virginia.)
Hamilton won on all three of these propositions, and a constitution was
framed in accordance with his views, and submitted to the people. I
quote below a report of the last day’s stormy session of this memorable
convention, by Whilden, the brilliant correspondent of the Galveston
News:
“TEXAS CONVENTION.
“Austin, Texas, February 8, 1869.
“Special to the Galveston News.
“Precisely at what point to begin I am in doubt. This convention, which
we thought was to give civil government to Texas and to which we
necessarily attached some dignity, has in the end proved itself to be a
farce on the civilization of the nineteenth century. Jack Hamilton and a
few others did all that genius could do to turn its purposes to
legitimate ends. Partially they failed; but in that failure they left
the impress of brains upon the wild waste of passion which this
convention has given to the world. * * * All mortal things shall ever
have an ending, and this convention is as all other mortal things.
“Strategic movements on the part of Davis and Hamilton have filled up
the time. Between these two men there can be no comparison. * * *
“On last Friday night the cloud burst, and for a few moments the curse
of heaven seemed to hang as a pillar of flame over the convention hall.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account