Fossil Butterflies: Memoirs of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, I.Scudder, Samuel Hubbard
Science
Fossil Butterflies: Memoirs of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, I.
Scudder, Samuel Hubbard
Butterflies, Fossil
=====================================================================
_Neorina_ _Antirrhæa_ _Anchiphlebia_
_Lowii_, _Philoctetes_, _Archæa_,
Boisd. Linn. Hübn.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Form of front wings, *
Form of hind wings, . . *
Tails of hind wings
(intermediate in
character between), * *
Submarginal spots of
front wings, * * *
Black disco-submarginal
spots of hind wings, . . *
Pale costal and discal
banding of wings, *? . . *
Limitation of dark dentated
basal area of hind wings, . . . . *
Submarginal line of hind wings, *
=====================================================================
The venation appears to be nearly similar to that of
Anchiphlebia. It is doubtful, however, whether the drawing
of the veins has been sufficiently attended to, to offer any
reliable characters.
In this paper he quotes Boisduval’s locality “Aix en Provence,” but when
he next refers to this insect[P] he gives it as from “Aix-la-Chapelle,
White sandstone,” a mistake, however, corrected subsequently. In this
latter paper he remarks:
I have discussed the position of this species in my catalogue
of Satyridæ, pp. 189, 190; showing that its nearest ally is
_Neorina Lowii_, a common Bornean species, but that it also has
a slightly more distant relationship to _Antirrhæa Philoctetes_
and _Anchiphlebia Archæa_, two common tropical American
forms; the amount of affinity, as regards the first two of
these species, may be seen on my plate, figs. 4 and 5; the
resemblance to Anchiphlebia is less striking, and the affinity
more doubtful; it has nothing to do with Cyllo.
That Butler should have so nearly pointed out the exact affinities of
this insect from the simple study of Boisduval’s plate, is unquestionably
due to his extended familiarity with butterflies, and especially with the
forms of this subfamily; but it also shows the essential harmony between
the markings of the under and upper surface of the wings of butterflies,
notwithstanding their frequent great dissimilarity; for Butler compares
this fossil with the recent forms on the assumption that the under
surface of the wings is seen in Boisduval’s plate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account