Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
The name was proposed by Sir Joseph Hooker for some specimens found
by Dr Strickland[390] in the Ludlow bone-bed (Silurian) of Woolhope
and May-Hill. Examples were subsequently recorded from the Wenlock
limestone of Malvern and from Silurian and Old Red Sandstone rocks of
other districts. Hicks[391] found _Pachytheca_ in the Pen-y-Glog grits
of Corwen in association with _Nematophycus_, and the two fossils have
been found together elsewhere. This association led to the suggestion
that _Pachytheca_ might be the sporangium of _Nematophycus_, and
Dawson[392], in conformity with his belief in the coniferous character
of the latter plant, referred to _Pachytheca_ as a true seed.
The best sections of this fossil have been prepared with remarkable
skill by Mr Storrie of Cardiff; they were carefully examined and
described by Barber in two memoirs[393] published in the _Annals
of Botany_, the account being illustrated by several well executed
drawings and microphotographs.
Among other difficulties to contend against in the interpretation of
_Pachytheca_ there is that of mineralisation. The preservation is such
as to render the discrimination of original structure as distinct from
structural features of secondary origin, consequent on a particular
manner of crystallisation of the siliceous material, a matter of
considerable difficulty.
Suggestions as to the nature of _Pachytheca_ have been particularly
numerous; it has been referred to most classes of plants and relegated
by some writers to the animal kingdom. The most recent addition to our
knowledge of this problematic fossil was the discovery of a specimen
by Mr Storrie in which the _Pachytheca_ sphere rested in a small cup,
like an acorn fruit in its cupule. This specimen was figured and
described by Mr George Murray[394] in 1895; he expresses the opinion
that the discovery makes the taxonomic position of the genus still more
obscure. Solms-Laubach briefly refers to _Pachytheca_ in connection
with _Nematophycus_, and regards its precise nature almost as much
an unsolved riddle now as it was when first discovered. For a fuller
account of this fossil reference must be made to the contributions
of Hooker[395], Barber[396] and others. The literature is quoted by
Barber and more recently by Solms-Laubach[397]. There are several
specimens and microscopic sections of _Pachytheca_ in the geological
and botanical departments of the British Museum. The genus has been
recorded from Shropshire, North Wales, Malvern, Herefordshire,
Perthshire and other British localities, as well as from Canada; it
occurs in both Silurian and Old Red Sandstone rocks.
_Algites._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account