Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
The plant reproduced in fig. 48 A (_Tristichia_), one of the
Podostemaceae, might easily be mistaken for a foliose Liverwort if
found as a fragmentary fossil. Such species of _Selaginella_ as _S.
Oregana_ Eat. and _S. rupestris_ Spring (fig. 48 C) have a distinctly
moss-like habit and do not present a very obvious resemblance to the
more typical and better known Selaginellas. The twig of a _Podocarpus_
(_P. cupressina_)[454] in fig. 48 B affords an instance of a conifer
which simulates to some extent certain of the larger-leaved Liverworts;
it bears a resemblance also to some fossil fragments referred to
_Selaginellites_ or _Lycopodites_. A small fossil specimen figured by
Nathorst[455] from Japan as possibly a _Lycopodites_ may be compared
with a coniferous twig, and with some of the larger Liverworts, _e.g._
species of _Plagiochila_[456]. _Podocarpus cupressina_ is, however,
chiefly instructive as an example of the striking differences which are
met with among species of the same genus; it differs considerably from
the ordinary species of _Podocarpus_, and might well be identified as a
member of some other group than that of the Coniferae.
We have no records of Palaeozoic Hepaticae. The fossils which Zeiller
has figured in his _Flore de Brive_ as _Schizopteris dichotoma_
Gümb.[457] and _S. trichomanoides_ Göpp. bear a resemblance to some
forms of hepatics, but there is no satisfactory evidence for removing
them from the position assigned to them by the French writer. In
Mesozoic rocks a few specimens are known which bear a close resemblance
as regards the form of the thalloid body to recent Liverworts, but
the identification of such fossils cannot be absolutely trusted. Two
French authors, MM. Fliche and Bleicher[458], have described a plant
from Lower Oolite rocks near Nancy as a species of _Marchantia_,
_M. oolithus_, but they point out the close agreement of such
forked laminar structures to algae and lichens. From Tertiary and
Post-Tertiary beds a certain number of fossil species have been
recorded, but they possess no special botanical interest.
ORDER MARCHANTIALES.
The plant-body is always thalloid, bearing rhizoids on the lower
surface, and having an epidermis with pores limiting the upper or
dorsal surface.
_Marchantites._
This convenient generic name was proposed by Brongniart in 1849[459];
it may be briefly defined as follows:
Vegetative body of laminar form, with apparently dichotomous
branches, and agreeing in habit with the recent thalloid Hepaticae,
as represented by such a genus as _Marchantia_.
The name _Marchantites_ is preferable to _Marchantia_, as the latter
implies identity with the recent genus, whereas the former is used in a
wide sense and refers rather to a definite form of vegetative body than
to a particular generic type.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account