Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
1. Transverse section; _t_, vascular bundle; _x_, sheath of cells.
× 35.
2. Vascular bundle consisting of a few small tracheids, _t_.
3. A tracheid and a few parenchymatous cells, the latter with nuclei.
4. A stoma; _s_, _s_, guard-cells.
5. Pallisade cells and intercellular spaces.
From a section in the Manchester Museum, Owens College.]
The nature of the assimilating tissue, the comparatively thick band of
thin-walled cells with intercellular spaces, and the exposed position
of the stomata suggest that the plant lived in a fairly damp climate;
at least there is nothing to indicate any adaptation to a dry climate.
In the Binney collection of plants in the Woodwardian Museum,
Cambridge, there is a species of a very small shoot bearing three or
four verticils of leaves which possess the same structure as those of
fig. 86. We may probably regard such twigs as the slender terminal
branches of Calamitean shoots.
α. _Calamocladus_ (_Asterophyllites_).
The generic name _Asterophyllites_ was proposed by Brongniart[641] in
1822 for a fossil previously named by Schlotheim[642] _Casuarinites_,
and afterwards transferred to Sternberg’s genus _Annularia_. In 1828
Brongniart[643] gave the following diagnosis of the fossils which he
included under the genus _Asterophyllites_:—“Stems rarely simple,
usually branched, with opposite branches, which are always disposed in
the same plane; leaves flat, more or less linear, pointed, traversed by
a simple median vein, free to the base.” Lindley and Hutton described
examples of Brongniart’s genus as species of _Hippurites_[644], and
other authors adopted different names for specimens afterwards referred
to _Asterophyllites_.
At a later date Ettingshausen[645] and other writers expressed the
view that the fossils which Brongniart regarded as a distinct genus
were the foliage-shoots of _Calamites_, and Ettingshausen went so far
as to include them in that genus. In view of the generally expressed
opinion as to the Calamitean nature of _Asterophyllites_, Schimper[646]
proposed the convenient generic name _Calamocladus_ for “rami et
ramuli foliosi” of _Calamites_. Some recent authors have adopted this
genus, but others prefer to retain _Asterophyllites_. In a recent
important monograph by Grand’Eury[647] Calamitean foliage-shoots are
included under the two names, _Asterophyllites_ and _Calamocladus_;
the latter type of foliage-shoots he associates with the stems of
the subgenus _Calamodendron_, and the former he connects with those
Calamitean stems which belong to the subgenus _Arthropitys_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account