Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
[Sidenote: DECORTICATED STEMS.]
The fact that plants usually occur in detached fragments, and that
they have often been sorted by water, and that portions of the same
plant have been embedded in sediment considerable distances apart,
is a constant source of difficulty. Deciduous leaves, cones, or
angiospermous flowers, and other portions of a plant which become
naturally separated from the parent tree, are met with as detached
specimens, and it is comparatively seldom that we have the necessary
data for reuniting the isolated members. As the result of the partial
decay and separation of portions of the same stem or branch, the wood
and bark may be separately preserved. Darwin[143] describes how the
bark often falls from _Eucalyptus_ trees, and hangs in long shreds,
which swing about in the wind, and give to the woods a desolate and
untidy appearance. In the passage already quoted from the narrative
of the voyage of the Challenger, illustrations are afforded of
the manner in which detached portions of plants are likely to be
preserved in a fossil state. The epidermal layer of a leaf or the
surface tissues of a twig may be detached from the underlying tissues
and separately preserved[144]. It is exceedingly common for a stem
to be partially decorticated before preservation, and the appearance
presented by a cast or impression of the surface of a woody cylinder,
and by the same stem with a part or the whole of its cortex intact
is strikingly different. The late Prof. Balfour[145] draws attention
to this source of error in his text-book of palaeobotany, and gives
figures illustrating the different appearance presented by a branch
of _Araucaria imbricata_ Pav. when seen with its bark intact and more
or less decorticated. Specimens that are now recognised as casts of
stems from which the cortex had been more or less completely removed
before preservation, were originally described under distinct generic
names, such as _Bergeria_, _Knorria_ and others. These are now known
to be imperfect examples of Sigillarian or Lepidodendroid plants.
Grand’Eury[146] quotes the bark of _Lepidodendron Veltheimianum_ Presl.
as a fossil which has been described under twenty-eight specific names,
and placed in several genera.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account