Fossil plants, Vol. 2 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 2 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
In 1831 Mr Witham[340] published an anatomical description of a
fragment of a _Lepidodendron_ which he named _Lepidodendron Harcourtii_
after Mr C. G. V. Vernon Harcourt from whom the specimen was originally
obtained. The fossil was found in rocks belonging to the Calciferous
series in Northumberland. Witham reproduced the account of this
species in his classic work on _Fossil Vegetables_[341], and Lindley
and Hutton[342], who examined Mr Harcourt’s material, published a
description of it in their _Fossil Flora_ in which they expressed
the view that _Lepidodendron_ is intermediate between Conifers and
Lycopods. Adolphe Brongniart[343] included in his memoir on _Sigillaria
elegans_ an account of Witham’s species based on material presented to
the Paris Museum by Mr Hutton and Robert Brown. Dr Kidston[344] has
shown that the actual transverse section figured by Witham is now in
the York Museum; a piece of stem in the same Museum, which is not the
specimen from which Witham’s section was cut, supplied the transverse
section figured by Brongniart. The figures given by Lindley and Hutton
do not appear to have been made from the York specimens. In 1887
Williamson[345] published a note in which he pointed out that some of
the specimens described by him as _L. Harcourtii_ should be transferred
to a distinct species, which he named _L. fuliginosum_. Subsequently
in 1893 he gave a fuller account of Witham’s species; it has, however,
been shown by Dr Kidston and by Mr Watson[346] that certain specimens
identified by Williamson as _L. Harcourtii_ differ sufficiently from
that type to be placed in another species, for which Watson proposes
the name _L. Hickii_.
A paper on _L. Harcourtii_ published by Bertrand[347] in 1891 extends
our knowledge of this type in regard to several anatomical details.
It was recognised by Williamson that the absence of secondary wood
in shoots possessing the anatomical characters of _L. Harcourtii_
is a feature to which no great importance should be attached. It is
possible that the large stems from the Isle of Arran described by
Williamson[348] as _Lepidodendron Wünschianum_, in which the secondary
wood is well developed, may be specifically identical with the smaller
specimens from Northumberland and elsewhere which are recognised as
examples of Witham’s type.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account