Fossil plants, Vol. 2 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geology — John Shaqi
Fossil plants, Vol. 2 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 2 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
The discovery of this new type of strobilus naturally led to a search
among Lower Carboniferous plants for vegetative shoots exhibiting
characters conformable with the whorled and branched leaves of
_Cheirostrobus_. In _Sphenophyllum_ we have a genus obviously
comparable with _Cheirostrobus_ as regards the form and disposition
of the leaves, but the differences between the cones and the striking
similarity of the vascular cylinder of the latter to that of
_Lepidodendron_ demonstrate conclusively that we must look elsewhere
for the vegetative members of the plant which produced cones of the
_Cheirostrobus_ type.
[Sidenote: PSEUDOBORNIA]
In 1902 Professor Nathorst[21] instituted the generic name
_Pseudobornia_ for plants of which imperfect examples had previously
been referred by Heer[22] to _Calamites_ under the name _C. radiatus_.
Heer’s plants were obtained from Upper Devonian rocks of Bear Island
in the Arctic seas and additional specimens were brought from the
same locality by the Swedish Polar Expedition of 1898. _Pseudobornia_
possesses jointed stems (fig. 117, D) bearing whorled and shortly
stalked leaves, often four in number, at each node. The leaves are
palmately branched with fine serrated edges (fig. 117, C). Certain
specimens, which are no doubt correctly described by Nathorst as
cones, are characterised by a thick axis bearing whorled leaves
with sporangia on their lower surfaces, but the material is not
sufficiently well preserved to render possible a recognition of
structural details. It has been suggested by Scott that _Pseudobornia_
may possibly be referable to the Sphenophyllales and that the stem of
_Cheirostrobus_ “may have had something in common with” Nathorst’s
genus[23]. The beds in which the stems occur are of Upper Devonian age,
while _Cheirostrobus_ was found in Lower Carboniferous rocks: this
difference in age is not, however, a serious objection to the validity
of the comparison. We cannot do more than express the view that
_Pseudobornia_, so far as can be ascertained without an examination of
petrified material or of more perfect impressions of strobili, exhibits
vegetative features not inconsistent with the morphological characters
of the fertile shoots known as _Cheirostrobus_.
• • • • •
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account