Fossil plants, Vol. 3 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 3 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
micropylar tube a seed of _Encephalartos Lehmanni_ presents a fairly
close resemblance to a _Trigonocarpus_. Salisbury has pointed out that
the three species _T. Parkinsoni_, _T. shorensis_, _T. pusillus_ form
a consecutive series illustrating the gradual disappearance of the
secondary ribs that form a prominent feature in _T. Parkinsoni_; but
for a comparison of these with other types of fossil and recent seeds
the reader is referred to Salisbury’s summary[858].
=Tripterospermum.= Brongniart.
The seed on which this genus was founded by Brongniart[859] is clearly
very closely related to _Trigonocarpus_ and, as Oliver[860] says,
the distinguishing character described by the author of the genus is
unimportant. Brongniart describes the type species, _T. rostratum_,
as characterised by the presence of three prominent wings composed of
a testa differentiated into an inner hard tissue and an outer lacunar
tissue. It is, however, hardly possible to say whether the outer soft
tissue was originally flattened in the form of ‘wings’ or pressed down
on to the harder shell. Renault[861] notes the association of seeds
that he refers to this genus with the leaves of _Dorycordaites_, but
apart from the improbability of any connexion between _Tripterospermum_
and _Cordaites_, Renault’s seeds are too imperfect to demonstrate
their identity with Brongniart’s genus. Kidston[862] has described an
impression of a three-winged seed from the coal-field of Staffordshire
as _Tripterospermum ellipticum_, a form described on page 357 as
_Polypterocarpus anglicus_ (fig. 496, B).
=Ptychotesta.= Brongniart.
The type-species of this genus[863], _Ptychotesta tenuis_[864], about
3 cm. long, is characterised by six very prominent flanges or wings
formed by the fissured or folded sclerotesta (fig. 495, B). There is no
information as to the vascular supply or other anatomical details. It
is not at all improbable that there is no real distinction between this
genus and Brongniart’s genus _Hexapterospermum_.
=Hexapterospermum.= Brongniart.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account