Four American poets : $b William Cullen Bryant, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, John Greenleaf Whittier, Oliver Wendell Holmes : A book for young Americans — John Shaqi
Four American poets : $b William Cullen Bryant, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, John Greenleaf Whittier, Oliver Wendell Holmes : A book for young AmericansCody, Sherwin
General
Four American poets : $b William Cullen Bryant, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, John Greenleaf Whittier, Oliver Wendell Holmes : A book for young Americans
Cody, Sherwin
Bryant, William Cullen, 1794-1878 -- Juvenile literature; Holmes, Oliver Wendell, 1809-1894 -- Juvenile literature; Longfellow, Henry Wadsworth, 1807-1882 -- Juvenile literature; Poets, American -- 19th century -- Biography -- Juvenile literature; Whittier, John Greenleaf, 1807-1892 -- Juvenile lite
The Quaker, with his broad-brimmed hat, his queer, old-fashioned coat,
and his habit of saying “thee must” and “thee must not,” was not only an
honest man, but a good-natured, sensible man as well. The poet Whittier
was a good Quaker, as “calm and firm and true” as the Quaker in his poem.
He was also fond of children, and his best poems are about children and
childhood days.
It is only a little over two hundred years since the first Quakers
appeared. Whittier’s great-great-grandfather, Thomas Whittier, was
said to be a Huguenot by descent. He came from England, however, as a
Puritan, and held various offices in the Puritan church in Salisbury and
Haverhill, in northeastern Massachusetts, where he settled.
It happened that two Quakers, Joseph Peasley and Thomas Macy, who had
come to Haverhill, were arrested and fined for “exhorting” on the Lord’s
day. They did it in their own houses; but in those Puritan times, all
the exhorting had to be done in church by regular ministers. Thomas
Whittier thought these men had been treated rather unjustly, and he and
others petitioned the legislature, or General Court, to pardon them.
But the old Puritans thought these petitioners about as bad as the
“heretics” themselves, as the Quakers were regarded, and notified them
that they must take back their petition or be punished. Thomas Whittier
and Christopher Hussey, though not Quakers, refused, and were deprived of
their right to vote, or, as it was called, “their rights as freemen.”
Thomas Whittier was such a good, sensible man, however, that the people,
although he was suspended from voting, had to ask him to help them
do various things in the church; and after a while the General Court
restored his “rights as a freeman.” He himself never became a Quaker,
but his son married a daughter of Joseph Peasley, and so most of the
Whittiers after that were Quakers. Yet there were some who were not; for
history tells of a Colonel Whittier about the time of the Revolution. He
could not have been a Quaker, for no good Quaker ever goes into the army.
The Quakers are a peculiar people. They do not believe in fighting or
going to war on any account. They are always for peace. The poet Whittier
was opposed to war, and often wrote against it; and he refused to favor
the Civil War, which freed the slaves, although he had himself been for
many years a great antislavery reformer, along with his friend William
Lloyd Garrison. But he admits that he had a sort of diabolical liking
for the army and war, and once he wrote a war poem and had it published
anonymously. He thought no one would ever know who wrote it, for it
didn’t sound much like a Quaker; but when he had become an old man some
one did find it out, and he had to admit that he was its author.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account