Fragments of Science: A Series of Detached Essays, Addresses, and Reviews. V. 1-2 — John Shaqi
Fragments of Science: A Series of Detached Essays, Addresses, and Reviews. V. 1-2Tyndall, John
Science
Fragments of Science: A Series of Detached Essays, Addresses, and Reviews. V. 1-2
Tyndall, John
Chemistry; Physics; Science
But ambiguity in the use of the term 'force' makes itself more and
more felt as we proceed. We have called the attraction of gravity a
force, without any reference to motion. A body resting on a shelf is
as much pulled by gravity as when, after having been pushed off the
shelf, it falls towards the earth. We applied the term force also to
that molecular attraction which we called chemical affinity. When,
however, we spoke of the conservation of force, in the case of elastic
collision, we meant neither a pull nor a push, which, as just
indicated, might be exerted upon inert matter, but we meant force
invested in motion--the _vis viva_, as it is called, of the colliding
masses.
Force in this form has a definite mechanical measure, in the amount of
work that it can perform. The simplest form of work is the raising of
a weight. A man walking up-hill, or up-stairs, with a pound weight in
his hand, to an elevation say of sixteen feet, performs a certain
amount of work, over and above the lifting of his own body. If he
carries the pound to a height of thirty-two feet, he does twice the
work; if to a height of forty-eight feet, he does three times the
work; if to sixty-four feet, he does four times the work, and so on.
If, moreover, he carries up two pounds instead of one, other things
being equal, he does twice the work; if three, four, or five pounds,
he does three, four, or five times the work. In fact, it is plain
that the work performed depends on two factors, the weight raised and
the height to which it is raised. It is expressed by the product of
these two factors.
But a body may be caused to reach a certain elevation in opposition to
the force of gravity, without being actually carried up. If a hodman,
for example, wished to land a brick at an elevation of sixteen feet
above the place where he stood, he would probably pitch it up to the
bricklayer. He would thus impart, by a sudden effort, a velocity to
the brick sufficient to raise it to the required height; the work
accomplished by that effort being precisely the same as if he had
slowly carried up the brick. The initial velocity to be imparted, in
this case, is well known. To reach a height of sixteen feet, the
brick must quit the man's hand with a velocity of thirty-two feet a
second. It is needless to say, that a body starting with any
velocity, would, if wholly unopposed or unaided, continue to move for
ever with the same velocity. But when, as in the case before us, the
body is thrown upwards, it moves in opposition to gravity, which
incessantly retards its motion, and finally brings it to rest at an
elevation of sixteen feet. If not here caught by the bricklayer, it
would return to the hodman with an accelerated motion, and reach his
hand with the precise velocity it possessed on quitting it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account