France in eighteen hundred and two : $b Described in a series of contemporary lettersYorke, Henry Redhead
History
France in eighteen hundred and two : $b Described in a series of contemporary letters
Yorke, Henry Redhead
France -- Description and travel
But the world possesses more scope for labour than it possesses hands,
and the powers of mechanism by simplifying the process of manufacture
also diminish the price of the article, bringing it thereby into
general circulation and opening a more lucrative commerce to a nation
by underselling the produce of foreign countries and so putting an end
to all competition.
The true principle of public economy begins to be studied in every part
of Europe, and we are making a slow but certain progress in improvement.
But if the rash spirit of innovation takes possession of the minds of
those who govern mankind, if they will insist on bringing all things
within a punctilious system of rules, they must not be surprised if
their fondness for precision should terminate in a similar anarchy to
that which has oppressed and ruined France.
XXVII
THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE
The decay of letters and philosophy during the progress of the French
Revolution placed the French under the necessity of establishing some
measures to restore the cultivation of science and literature. Thus the
National Institute was eventually formed. The old Academies had been
completely destroyed, their members banished, murdered, or dispersed.
[Sidenote: THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE]
The National Institute is designed to remedy this evil by once more
collecting together the genius, talents and industry of France, and it
belongs to the whole Republic and is fixed at Paris. It is composed of
_one hundred and forty-four members resident in the capital_, and
144 Associates, taken from different parts of the Republic, together
with 24 learned foreigners. Every preference in this arrangement is
manifestly given to Paris, at the expense of the Departments.
The Departments, containing a majority of 30 to 1 compared with the
metropolis, are never expected to produce more great men collectively
than the latter. This is absurd, for every one knows that under the old
Monarchy there were men scattered over the provinces often equal and in
many instances far superior to the members of the Parisian Academies.
Montesquieu[1] was a member of the Academy of Bordeaux in 1716, and
it was not till the year 1728 that he was admitted into the Académie
Française. Indeed, an admittance into that famous society was often no
evidence of supereminent merit. Genius had to contest against cabal,
intrigue and Court favour; so that the _literati_ of Europe looked
for great and estimable men in other Academies of France, such as Aix,
Marseilles, Lyons, Bordeaux, &c.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account