France in eighteen hundred and two : $b Described in a series of contemporary lettersYorke, Henry Redhead
History
France in eighteen hundred and two : $b Described in a series of contemporary letters
Yorke, Henry Redhead
France -- Description and travel
The cavalry followed and the foreign Ministers and Ministers of State.
Madame Letitia Bonaparte,[1] the Consul’s mother, a truly good,
respectable woman, and Madame Bonaparte,[1] the reigning Queen, with
Madame Louis Bonaparte,[1] her daughter, proceeded by another route
(not taking part in the procession). They occupied with their suite
two splendid coaches and four, each horse led by a running footman in
green and gold livery and escorted by a squadron of Hussars. The corps
of Mamelukes, leading six beautiful chargers of the First Consul, each
horse caparisoned to the tune of £2500, preceded the state coach, which
contained the three Consuls, attired in their consular garb of scarlet
velvet, embroidered with gold. These rulers were drawn by eight bay
horses and followed by a regiment of Hussars. Discharges of artillery
continued from their departure from the Palace till their arrival at
the Cathedral Church of Paris.
Three chairs of state were placed in front of the altar for the
Consuls, that of Bonaparte’s was advanced a little in front of the
other two, and he drew it still further forward before he seated
himself. He sat erect during the whole ceremony, except during the
Consecration of the Host and Communion, when he stood. At the elevation
of the Host he crossed himself with the most sanctified composure,
using that same hand which in Egypt had signed his abjuration of
the Christian faith. The Consul le Brun[1] sat on his right hand
and Cambacères[1] on his left. When High Mass was over, the Bishops
approached in turn to take the oath of allegiance: as each mitred
apostle knelt before Bonaparte he gave a gentle nod; but one poor old
prelate, almost blind by age and too weak to kneel, having by mistake,
directed his obeisance to Cambacères, the First Consul gave such a
frown that the poor old man was almost terrified out of his wits.
To form a just idea of the feelings of those present one must remember
that the greater part of the company consisted of the Senate, the
Corps Législatif, the Tribunalate and the Generals, nearly all of whom
had been or were avowed atheists, notorious for murders, thefts and
atrocities they had perpetrated, while the Chief Magistrate had a few
years earlier worshipped at the altar of atheism in Paris and embraced
the religion of Mahomet in Africa. These persons were now assembled
together to adore a God in whom they had no faith and to propose a
religion they despised merely that they might be enabled to preserve
their authority over the people and retain their lucrative places and
appointments. To my mind this is an occurrence in the history of pious
fraud only equalled by the action of Judas Iscariot.
I may safely affirm that with exception of the Bishops and clergy,
there was not a single official personage in the church who quitted
this religious mockery with a sentiment of piety in his heart, nor one
who did not perfectly see through the whole object of the ceremony.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account