I am indeed glad that you are working at Bracton and settling the relation between the MSS. I wish that you would stay here and teach us something about our old books. Pollock is looking forward to your paper and I am diligently reading Bracton in order that I may understand it. I have written for Pollock a paper about seisin and had occasion to deal with a bit of Bracton which, as printed, is utter rubbish. I therefore looked at some of the MSS and found that the blunder was an old one. I shall not have occasion to say any more than that there are manuscripts which make good sense of the passage--but I have made a note[12] about the matter which I send to you thinking it just possible that you may care to see it, as it goes some little way (a very little way) to show that certain MSS are closely related. I have to dine in Oxford on Saturday, 10th May, and shall be there on Sunday the 11th. I hope that you will be in Oxford on that day and that we shall meet. TO FREDERICK POLLOCK. (On a postcard.) _Jan. 1881._ Et Fredericus de Cantebrigia essoniavit se de malo lecti, et essoniator dixit quod habuit languorem. Set quia essonium non jacet in breui de trampagio consideratum est quod summoneatur et quod sit in misericordia pro falso essonio suo. Postea uenit et defendit omnem defaltam et sursisam et dicit quod non debet ad hoc breve respondere quia non tenetur ire in trampagio nisi tantum quando dominus capitalis suus eat in persona sua propria nec vult nec debet ire cum ballivo vel preposito, et ipse et omnes antecessores sui semper a conquestu Anglie usque nunc habuerunt et habent talem libertatem, et de hoc ponit se super patriam, etc. Revera predictus F. seisitus fuit de uno frigore valde damnando. Judicium--Recuperet se ipsum. TO FREDERICK POLLOCK. 15, BROOKSIDE, CAMBRIDGE. _12 Nov. 1887._ Very many thanks to you for a copy of your book on "Torts"--I am already deep in it and am reading it with delight. You will believe that coming from me this is not an empty phrase, for you will do me the justice of believing that I can find a good book of law very delightful. I hope that it may be as great a success as "Contracts"--I can hardly wish you better. I now see some prospect of getting the Law of Torts pretty well studied by the best of the undergraduates. For weeks I have been in horrible bondage to my lectures--Stephen's chapters about the Royal Prerogatives and so forth--I speak of the Stephen of the Commentaries--are a terrible struggle: when one is set to lecture on them three days a week one practically has to write a book on constitutional law against time. I cannot, alas, be at the Selden meeting on Monday, for I have undertaken to audit some accounts. With many more thanks I rest Sectator tuus set minus sufficiens. F. W. MAITLAND. TO PAUL VINOGRADOFF. 15, BROOKSIDE, CAMBRIDGE. _12 June, 1887._