had been offered by the people of Scotland against the destruction of Foyers! And what of the pitiful ruin of Loch Katrine?--once an unspoilt gem of Highland scenery, doubly beloved for the sake of Sir Walter Scott’s “Lady of the Lake”? What of the submerging of “Ellen’s Isle”?--the ruthless uprooting of that “entangled wood”-- Where Nature scattered, free and wild. Each plant or flower, the mountain’s child,-- Here eglantine embalmed the air, Heather and hazel mingled there. * * * * * The wanderer’s eye could barely view The summer heaven’s delicious blue-- So wondrous wild!--the whole might seem The scenery of a fairy dream! I have been assured on the very best authority that all the beauty of Loch Katrine could have been left undisturbed, had the Scottish people taken any actively determined measures towards preserving it. The increasing water-supply necessary for Glasgow could have been procured from Loch Vennachar, which is a larger loch, and quite as good for the purpose. Only it would have cost more money, and that extra cash was not forthcoming, even for Sir Walter’s sake! It is a poor return to make to the memory of him who did so much for the fame of Scotland, to mutilate the scene he loved and immortalized! The struggles and disasters of the Jacobite Cause, and the defeat at Culloden brought more gain than loss to Scotland, by filling the land with glorious song and heroic tradition,--the result of the noble idealistic spirit which made even failure honourable,--but the defacement of Loch Katrine, the scene of “The Lady of the Lake” is nothing but a disgrace to those who authorized it, and to those who kept silence while the deed was done.