Holding under the "Great Cham," the Duke of Moscow was in ancient
times a dependent prince, like the Hospodar of Valachia, like the
Pasha of Egypt in modern days. Doing homage, paying tribute to his
Tartar lord, the duke ruled in his place, coined money in his name,
adopted his dress and habits, fought his battles, and took into pay
his officers and troops. Cities which the Tartar could not reach, his
vassal crushed.
The Tartar system was a village system, as it is with every pastoral
and predatory race; a village for the followers, and a camp or
residence for the prince. The Russian system was a mixed system, as it
was in Germany and France; a village for the husbandman, a town for
the boyar, merchant, and professional man. The old Russian towns were
rich and free; ruled by codes of law, by popular assemblies, and by
elected dukes. Novgorod, Moscow, Pskoff, Vladimir, Nijni, were models
of a hundred prosperous towns; but when the Duke of Moscow wrested his
independence from the khan in the seventeenth century, he took up the
Tartar policy of weakening the free cities, and centring all authority
in his camp. That camp was Moscow, which Ivan put under martial law,
and governed, in Asiatic fashion, by the stick. The court became a
Tartar court. The dress and manners of Bakchi Serai were imitated in
the Kremlin; women were put into harems; the Tartar distinction of
white and black (noble and ignoble) was established. From the time
when the grand dukes became Tsars they were called White, the peasants
Black; and the poor of every class, whether they lived in towns or
villages, were styled, in contempt, as their Moslem masters had always
styled them, Christians--bearers of the cross--a name which descended
to the serfs, and clung to them so long as a serf existed on Russian
soil.
In leaving Moscow, Peter the Great was only acting like the Crim
Tartar who had changed his camp from Eski-Crim to Bakchi Serai. The
camp was his country, and where he rested for a season was his camp.
In Old Russia, as in Germany and France, authority was historical; in
Crim-Tartary, as in Turkey and Bokhara, it was personal. Ivan the
Terrible introduced, and Peter the Great extended, the personal
system. In her better days Russia had a noble class, as well as a
citizen class and a peasant class; but these signs of a glorious past
were gradually put away. "No man is noble in my empire, unless I make
him so," said Peter. "No man is noble in my empire, except when I
speak to him, and only while I speak to him," said Paul. The governors
of provinces became pashas, with the right of living on the districts
they were sent to rule; that is to say, of taking from the people
meat, drink, house, dogs, horses, women, at their sovereign will.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account