Though softened from time to time, here by fine phrases, there by
mystic patriotism, this Tartar system lived into the present reign.
Under this system, the prince was every thing, the people nothing; the
army a horde, the nobility an official mob, the Church a department of
police, the commons a herd of slaves.
Nicolas prized that system, and being a man of powerful frame and
daring mind, he carried it forward to a point from which it had been
falling back since the reign of Peter the Great. Unlike Peter, Nicolas
saw no use in Western science and Western arts. He hated railways, he
abhorred the press. He made his court a camp; he dressed his students
in uniform; he turned education into drill. He was the State, the
Church, the Army, all in one. Desiring to shut up his empire, as the
Khans of Khiva and Bokhara close their states, he drew a cordon round
his frontier, over which it was nearly as difficult for a stranger to
enter as for a subject to escape; and while he occupied the throne,
his country was almost as much a mystery to mankind as the realm of
Prester John. With mystery came distrust, for the unknown is always
feared; and Europe lay in front of this Tartar prince, exactly as in
former ages Moscow lay before Timour Beg. A system such as Nicolas
loved could not exist in presence of free and powerful states; and
Europe had to march upon the armies of Nicolas, even as Ivan the
Terrible had to march upon the troops of Yediguer Khan.
The system was Mongolian, not Slavonic; and the mighty sovereign who
upheld it, and perished with it, will be regarded in future ages as
the prince who was at once the last Asiatic emperor and the last
European khan.
When Alexander the Second came to his sceptre, what was his estate?
His empire was a wreck. The allies were upon his soil; his ports were
closed; his ships were sunk; his armies were held at bay. Looking from
the Neva to the Thames, he could not see one friend on whom in his
trouble he could call for help. The system was perfect; the isolation
was complete. But why had that system, reared at such a price,
collapsed so thoroughly at the point where it seemed to be most
strong?
His armies counted a million men. Why were these hosts unable to
protect their soil? They were at home; they knew the country; they
were used to its windy plains, its summer heats, and its wintry snows.
They were fighting, too, for every thing that men hold dear on earth.
When Alexander compared his million men against the forces of his
rivals actually in the field, his wonder grew into amazement. These
soldiers of his foes were weak in number, far from home, and fighting
only for pride and pay. How were such armies able to maintain
themselves on Russian ground?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account