The style Louis XIV. is but a development of the above. It is grander,
more pompous, more ornate. The cartouche projects further from the edge
of the shield, it terminates at the top in a large shell, in which
sometimes a female face is shown, or it may be a canopy is suspended
above by festoons of flowers. The ornamentation is still symmetrical,
and the foliations of the frame are precise and formal, every line
having a definite purpose in the design.
[Illustration: STYLE RÉGENCE (1715).]
In what is called the style Régence (some time after 1715) all this is
changed, a light arabesque design is found, quite _à la_ Watteau,
graceful and frivolous. Little urns on little brackets, tiny heads
springing up from nowhere, dainty festoons trailing round and about
without any definite aim in life, and finials at top and bottom which
finish nothing because nothing has been commenced.
[Illustration: STYLE LOUIS XV. (1730).]
Pretty, but short-lived, the style Régence gave way to what is known as
the Louis XV. This has been stigmatized as _Rococo_, but little we heed
the sneer; it has given us the loveliest of book-plates, and fortunately
this was the period when libraries and book-plates were most in fashion
in France. Curiously enough our artistic neighbours claim this style,
with all its graceful convolutions and irregularities, its scorn for
anything approaching regularity of form, as essentially French, whilst
we, with equal certainty, assign its invention to Chippendale and name
it after him. Without stopping to discuss the question of precedence,
that name will suffice to indicate to any British collector the style
Louis XV.: a pear-shaped shield in a framework ornamented with rockwork,
flowers, branches, and ribbons, a coronet, probably very much on one
side, not a straight line anywhere, and no two parts of the design
similar, the supporters being shown with the same disregard for method
or heraldic convention.
The reaction from this style to that of Louis XVI. is again clearly
marked. Straight lines and formal outlines reappear with solid square
bases to support the shields. Above the shields the coronets are clearly
and neatly shown, and from them hang, in graceful curves, wreaths of
flowers, festoons of roses, palm branches, or laurel leaves. On the
bases, in some cases, the names of the owners appear, in others
geometrical ornaments, Greek key patterns, or simple festoons. This
style, somewhat formal and severe, yet essentially French, lasted until
the Revolution.
Under the first Empire there was no style, or what was worse, a bad
style, stiff, formal, semi-Greek, semi-Egyptian, and wholly false.
The Restoration brought little improvement--a Gothic revival, here
borrowing, there stealing, from all the styles that had been in vogue,
and spoiling all in turn.
And so it lasted until the fall of the second Empire, since when a
revival has set in of national life, of national art, and of art in
book-plates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account