One of their most cherished rights was that of bearing coat armour, but
little by little a rich middle class sprung up (the despised
_bourgeoisie_), which misappropriated coronets and coats-of-arms, and
shortly before the outbreak of the Revolution, heraldry in France was in
a most confused and chaotic condition.
As to the origin of French heraldry, little is known with any certainty.
That tournaments were first held in Germany about 938 is generally
admitted. At these the fundamental rules of all heraldry must, no doubt,
have been formulated, whence they gradually passed into France, through
the north-eastern provinces. Then followed the Crusades, which gave a
great impetus to the science of heraldry, as is shown by the vast number
of crosses in early arms; the crescents and stars, which were copied
from the captured standards of the Saracens; and the fabulous monsters
of the East, which became the heraldic devices of many noble families
descended from ancient warriors who fought in Palestine. Louis VII.
(Louis le Jeune), who superintended all the arrangements for the
coronation of his son, Philip Augustus, was the first to employ the
_Fleur-de-Lys_ as the royal badge of France, which he caused to be
emblazoned on all the ornaments and utensils employed in the coronation
ceremony. He was also the first king who employed that badge on his
seal.[1] This was before 1180.
Henceforward heraldry became generally popular, and many works were
written to define the rules of chivalry, each one more elaborate than
the preceding. King John of France devoted much attention to heraldry,
as did several of his successors, and then the historians Froissart,
Monstrelet, and Olivier de la Marche introduced it into their
chronicles. Indeed, there is scarcely one early French romance which
does not contain the full blazon of the imaginary arms conferred upon
its fabulous personages.
When at length heraldry became fully recognized, its signs and emblems
were chosen as the badges of hereditary nobility. In the course of time
this attracted the envy of vain and unscrupulous people, who usurped
the insignia of nobility which they were not by law entitled to wear.
These malpractices gave rise to great confusion, and were not only
severely reprehended by all true lovers of heraldry, but were the
subject of many royal edicts, commanding that all offenders should be
heavily fined.
Before the year 1555 it had been a recognized custom that a member of
any one of the great families of France might change his name and his
arms without royal authority, a practice which was particularly useful
in certain marriages.
Thus, supposing the last inheritor of a famous family name to have been
a female, on marriage her husband could assume her name and armorial
bearings, and thus perpetuate a line which otherwise (as in Great
Britain) would have become extinct.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account