It is as well to remember that living as we do in a Protestant country,
our historians have been strongly biassed in their favour, and that
whilst the horrors of St. Bartholomew’s Day are always depicted in the
most lurid manner, little or nothing is said about the bloodshed and
cruelties inflicted by the Calvinists on the Catholics in those parts of
the country where they happened to be numerous and powerful. The two
factions hated one another for the love of God; it was a cruel period,
and, as Baron Rothschild remarks in his “Characteristics from French
History,” “There was nothing to choose between Protestants and Catholics
in their savage hatred of each other. The Protestants butchered the
Catholics whenever they had an opportunity, and all that happened at St.
Bartholomew was that the Catholics made a good score.” And this view
naturally presents itself to any unprejudiced reader of the history of
the period.
After frightful massacres and civil wars, the accession of Henry IV.
(himself a Calvinist) to the throne of France in 1589, gave promise of a
more tolerant spirit, and in April, 1598, he promulgated the famous
Edict of Nantes giving the Protestants a certain amount of religious
freedom. This wise measure was confirmed by his successors Louis XIII.
in 1610, and Louis XIV. in 1652. But later on, Louis XIV., under the
influence of Madame de Montespan and the Romish Church, saw fit to
revoke the Edict of Nantes in October, 1658, an act which was in its
consequences one of the most disastrous for the commerce and prosperity
of France.
It was the aim of Louis, and his ministers, to compel the members of the
Reformed Church to abjure their heresies, and return to the Catholic
Church, and in some remote country districts, or places where the
Huguenots were few and isolated, the plan succeeded. But in the main it
failed, as all forced religious conversions ever have failed, a lesson
which kings and priests have always before them, and yet never seem to
learn.
The forced exile of the Huguenot Ministers, after the revocation of the
Edict of Nantes, was the signal for flight to thousands of French
Protestants of both sexes, and of all classes and ages, and in spite of
the penalties proclaimed against emigration, and the punishments
inflicted upon those who were arrested in the attempt to leave their
country, an enormous number of persons did effect their escape to the
various Protestant States in Europe, and even to the then newly-settled
American colonies, but principally to our shores.
[Illustration: BOOK-PLATE OF THE FRENCH PROTESTANT HOSPITAL.]
They brought with them the art of manufacturing silk, and founded a
prosperous colony in Spitalfields, where their descendants yet remain.
Glass making, jewellery, and other trades in which taste and skill are
required, were also understood by them; they rapidly became naturalized,
and useful citizens, and the names and histories of many of our wealthy
families attest their Huguenot descent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account