French enterprise in Africa : $b the personal narrative of Lieut. Hourst of his exploration of the NigerHourst
History
French enterprise in Africa : $b the personal narrative of Lieut. Hourst of his exploration of the Niger
Hourst
French -- Sudan; Mali -- Description and travel; Niger River -- Description and travel; Tuaregs
How many, aye, some even greater men than he, have fallen
thus! Alas! it has been with the dead bodies of our countrymen that
the soil of the French Sudan, which we hope will some day yield
so rich a harvest, has been fertilized! Dare we add, that those
who went there in the hope of winning gold braid and crosses, got
“crosses” indeed, but they consisted only of two bits of wood
clumsily nailed together by some comrade, and set up in the corner
of a field of millet, beneath the shade of some baobab tree; poor
ephemeral crosses, soon eaten up by white ants, incapable even of
preserving the memory of the brave fellows buried beneath them.
But we must not bemoan too much the fate of these noble dead. We
must honour them and follow their example.
Well then, Davoust being dead, without having accomplished his task,
I vowed that a boat bearing his name should descend the river. This
promise I made in 1888, but it was not until 1896 that I was able
to redeem it. Now I have fulfilled my vow.
There is no doubt that it would have made all the difference in the
political results of my mission, if it could have been undertaken
eight or ten years earlier. For instance, in the negotiations which
took place in 1890, and were so inauspicious for our influence on the
Lower Niger, our plenipotentiaries would have been able to assert,
that the rapids at Burrum existed only in the imagination of Sir
Edward Malet, a fact not without its importance.
But we will not trouble ourselves with what the expedition ought to
have done—we will merely record what it did do.
My project, adopted by M. Delcassé, was that of Davoust, slightly
modified. Instead of employing gunboats drawing about three feet of
water, I found it best to employ barges of very slight draught worked
with oars. An attentive study of Dr. Barth’s narrative reveals how
very great were the difficulties of navigation, at least on those
parts of the river he himself explored; for it must be remembered
that he never spoke by hearsay. Of course a boat drawing a foot or
so only of water would easily pass over rapids, where such vessels
as the _Mage_ and the _Niger_ must inevitably come to grief.
Moreover, a steam-boat needs fuel, and that fuel would have to
be wood. Then we must go and cut that wood, which would give the
natives opportunities for hostility. Moreover, the machinery might
get out of order. Of course, rowing is slower than steaming, but
it is much safer. Then, too, we had the current in our favour; we
had but to let ourselves go and we should certainly arrive at some
goal, if not at a good port. The stream would carry our barges down,
with us on or under them, as Spartan mothers would have said.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account