French enterprise in Africa : $b the personal narrative of Lieut. Hourst of his exploration of the NigerHourst
History
French enterprise in Africa : $b the personal narrative of Lieut. Hourst of his exploration of the Niger
Hourst
French -- Sudan; Mali -- Description and travel; Niger River -- Description and travel; Tuaregs
Sir Edward Malet spoke of the Falls of Burrum; it would have been
quite enough to open Barth’s narrative to answer that these Falls
were non-existent. Reading the narrative of the German traveller might
also have taught us that when he passed through, _a descendant of the
ancient chiefs of the country was maintaining an independent position
in Argungu_, and the account of his perilous journey from Sokoto to
the banks of the Niger would have shown how very precarious was the
influence exercised by the Emir of Sokoto on the countries through
which he passed. Since 1890, when the Anglo-Franco treaty was signed,
that authority has continued to decrease. Kebbi, Mauri, Djerma,
and Dendi would very soon have got the better of their oppressors if
they had always worked together. However that may be, they have at
least now regained independence, and we French are the only European
people who have made any conventions with them. Strickly speaking,
the treaty signed by Monteil with Kebbi would be enough.
It is therefore no longer at Say, as the English pretend, that the
limit of French influence is reached. The line of demarcation,
according to the spirit as well as the letter of the treaty of
1890, ought to leave us the four provinces I have just named. We
are again about to abandon our rights won at the price of so much
trouble and fatigue. Better still, are we going to leave Sokoto
(strong through the weapons supplied by the English), after spreading
fire and destruction everywhere, to reduce to captivity and slavery
the peaceful but courageous swarms of population, capable as those
populations are of achieving prosperity under the paternal authority
of the French, so different from the commercial control aimed at by
our rivals?
Lord Salisbury, in the English Parliament, said scoffingly that
they had left nothing for the Gallic cock to do but to scratch up
the sand. Let us at least reclaim that sand, and if we can find
a little corner of fertile land which the diplomacy of that time
forgot to abandon, shall we let the diplomacy of to-day generously
hand that also over to our neighbours? Or will our diplomatists,
eager to avenge the insult put upon us, reply, “You deceived us by
false affirmations, we were stupid enough to have confidence enough
in your good faith without any preliminaries to assure us of it,
we are willing to bear with the results of our own simplicity, but
it has been a good lesson, and we forbid you to attempt to give us
another like it”?
I remember an Arab saying, which well applies to the circumstances
under discussion: “If my enemy deceives me once, may God curse him;
if he deceives me twice, may God curse us both; but if he deceives
me three times, may God curse me only.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account