“We publish more than our own share of worthless trash,” once said a
French writer to me, “but it is always better written than your trash,
for our bad writers must have some knowledge of grammar, which it appears
yours lack, and they must write with what looks like a certain measure
of style, whereas your bad writers shine by absence of the smallest
pretension to style of any kind”; which means, of course, that illiterate
French men and women know their language better than illiterate English
men and women know theirs. They have been better trained and disciplined
in the maintenance of grammatical laws. And while English journalism
would, I am confident, never descend into the gross personalities and
insults of the low French Press,—that kind of journalism presided over
by MM. Drumont of _La Libre Parole_, Millevoye of _La Patrie_, Judet of
_Le Petit Journal_, and Rochefort of _L’Intransigeant_, the unspeakable
_Intransigeant_,—more intellect, education, and style are expended in
the columns of an ordinary French paper than would be needed to carry
on a dozen successful London papers. No London journalist would think
it worth his while to spend an entire morning over the “confection” of
a bright leaderette, read to-day and forgotten to-morrow, or be content
to cast real brilliance on the ambient air in the reckless fashion of
the polished French journalist. The thousand exquisite things Daudet
in this fashion flung into the bottomless abyss of journalism without
a thought—Provençal spendthrift that he was!—that he was wasting his
intellectual capital!
The _Temps_, a Protestant organ, is the most serious, the best informed,
and the most respectable of Parisian newspapers. It has not the dash,
the astonishing verve, the invincible courage of the _Figaro_, but it is
always well written, moderate, and interesting. The dramatic and literary
columns are special features. The day of the _Débats_ is over. It once
held the first place as an intellectual and political paper, but it has
lost all vitality, and it has become that unacceptable thing in such
an atmosphere as Paris, _démodé_. Few of its subscribers have remained
faithful to it, and only one or two of its distinguished contributors.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account