be included, you discover that you might have boarded, with comfort,
independence, and good living, for the same price in one of the hotels
of the Rue de Rivoli. For independence is the very last thing the little
_bourgeoise_ is disposed to allow her “paying guest.” It needs a quality
of brain of which she is destitute, to recognise a single woman’s right
to liberty.
The foreign boarder’s days under her roof constitute a march through
surprises. Here no gleaming glass and shining damask at table; no
flowers, no silver, no tasteful arrangement of desert; for tablecloth a
coarse sheet and cloths to match for napkins, sometimes patched, and
invariably sewn down the middle. There is nothing to please the eye or
the palate, but the disappointed boarder must stoically hold her tongue
if she would maintain agreeable relations. The hostess is an arbitrary
as well as a parsimonious and dishonest housekeeper. The exactions, the
arrogance, must be allowed to remain all on her side and the malcontent
has nothing to do but pay a month’s board and lodging in advance and pack
up her things. If she stays, a hushed civility is expected from her, and
all payments rigidly in advance. Why, the little _bourgeoise_ should have
instituted this singular law, that a month’s food should be paid for
before it has been consumed, I have never been able to understand: but I
confess I have never been able to master the complicated ethics of this
interesting woman. She is a fervent Catholic, attends church regularly
morning and evening, confesses, teaches Catholicism and morality to the
outcast infant, and never seems to suspect that honesty is one of the
virtues incorporated in the Christian doctrine. When she orders anything
for you she will pay one price in the shop and charge you another; yet,
good, consistent creature, she goes to market on market days after Mass
to take note of the prices, in order to calculate to a farthing what the
day’s purchases will cost, so that the _bonne_ shall not cheat her of the
value of a sou. This is hard on the _bonne_, whom she pays as little
as she can, and underfeeds, and overworks, and who is thus defrauded of
one of the acknowledged perquisites of the servant in France,—_le sou
du franc_. When a Parisian servant makes a purchase over a franc, each
tradesman returns her a sou on every franc paid in cash. The avid “little
_bourgeoise_” usually insists on having this sou back, and if the _bonne_
is meek and afraid she gives up the sou, for her mistress understands the
question of perquisites only in her own right. She watches her servant
closely, though there is nothing of a shrew or a Sally Brass about her.
She victimises her through the attendant vice of avaricious, unsleeping
suspicion. And so she visits the kitchen when the girl has left, to see
if a lump of sugar or a piece of bread, or anything else, should be
secreted anywhere. Perhaps once a week she will give the domestic martyr
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account