boxes in, and serve as well as a hanging-clothes closet, plenty of water,
and excellent sanitary arrangements may be had in an enviable spot,
with pleasant outlook and good entrance, for six hundred francs a year
(£24); a _femme de ménage_ who will cook, market, mend, and clean up as
a French woman knows how, for six sous (threepence) an hour; and if you
treat her fairly well and secure her loyalty, she will give you devotion
and friendship, as well as excellent service and amazingly intelligent
speech. For here you need never be at the expense or trouble of cooking
complicated dishes. These are sold at the pastry-cook’s or the baker’s
for considerably less than they will cost you at home; so that you can
live well and keep your household bills within your means, even if meat
in Paris be dear. And then, when you want amusement, should your income
not permit of frequent theatre-going what need to open your purse? You
have but to open your house door, and emerge upon the public Place. On a
summer afternoon or evening a ride on the top of an omnibus or tram is
better entertainment than that offered by many a theatre in London. A
walk through old Paris, or along the ever lovely quays, is refreshment
enough for eye and fancy. Three sous will take you from the Madeleine
to the Bastille; and where is it you may not go from the Bastille for
another three sous? If the chestnuts are in bloom, on foot, or on the
_impériale_ of a public vehicle, in imagination you are wandering through
your own avenues; and you really have little envy for the rich in their
cushioned victorias. This is why I contend that the philosopher of either
sex, whose purse is light and whose tastes are frugal, can make shift
with less in Paris than elsewhere; can live and be infinitely happier
there on small means than in London. So much beauty is provided for him
gratis, that he must be a churl who can spend his time in moaning and
whining because his private walls are undecorated, or costly carpets
do not cover his floors. Let him go to the Louvre or Cluny Museum when
the fit takes him, and count himself a king without the cost and care
of sovereignty. Let him sit in the Tuileries, and call them his private
gardens while he feeds the sparrows; let him loaf among the book-stalls
of the Seine, and leisurely turn the pages of books he means not to buy.
Where will he better such luxuries, even at his own price, if fortune
stepped his way? In London, poverty is galling because there is no escape
from its meannesses and its miseries. That is why the poor in London
may be pardoned for taking to drink. That seems the only door, for it
would need that a poor man living in a London slum should be very drunk
indeed to find beauty of any kind in his environment. But poverty in
Paris may be found both amusing and instructive. I am not sure that it
is not the poor, the needy, the small clerk, the overworked teacher, the
shop-girl, the underfed student, who do not get the best of Paris; feel
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account