It is certain that Wolsey's proud spirit was not humbled, but that
he, with a little more pretension to learning, was not less
tyrannical. Sir Amias Pawlet cared nothing for him. He was a man of
principle--a plain, straightforward man--grave, austere, and proud.
He was not deficient in spirit, and a love of truth and propriety,
though he was neither equal to Wolsey, Sir John Nafant, or the
Marquis of Dorset, in letters or knowledge of the world. He was one
of those strong-minded men, attached to the good laws of the land he
lived in, and jealous too for the dignity of the church to which he
belonged. He was not, at the time treated of, a convert to the then
growing liberation of the souls of men from the corruptions of that
superstition which encompassed all Christendom, but he was sensibly
alive to the necessity of propriety in the character of the
priesthood, and a man who was too earnest and sincere in his
profession of religion to admit of any licentiousness.
It was not likely that such a man, coming in contact with the learned
and expansive genius of the young Wolsey, should shine before him.
He did not, for he bent not to the idol of popular greatness, when he
saw in him a regard only for things expedient, and a certain freedom
of speech and behaviour, even in the company of the gentry of those
counties, which ill became the Oxford divine, the tutor of the
Marquis of Dorset's sons, and the great scholar of Magdalen.
'I like not your country squire, most noble peer,' said Wolsey to the
Marquis: 'he is ignorant and positive, sturdy and absolute, and would
do better for a jailer than for a magistrate of this county.'
'I like not your visitor, my lord,' said Sir Amias to the Marquis.
'He is much too clever and intriguing for my liking. He, no doubt,
would be a very convenient father confessor; but I should as soon
think of looking for absolution to your lordship's bloodhound as to
him.'
Now the Marquis was fully convinced that the priest of Lymington and
the knight of the shire were distasteful to each other; but as he
respected both, he kept his own counsel, and did not interfere with
their respective animosities.
It was no small sin in those days to speak anything disrespectful of
the priesthood. Rome had such authority over the nobility, had
invented so many intrigues of priest-craft, and had obtained such an
ascendancy over the families of the great, that she employed
qualified spies in every house to subject the inmates to penances,
and works of her own imposition, even for the slightest offences,
with which she could have nothing to do, and which could never take
away one single fault.
Sir Amias, however, was not to be imposed upon by any requirements on
the part of the priesthood to which they did not themselves submit:
and in his own family he was strict and conscientious, and expected
his priest to be the same.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account