Friends in Council — First SeriesHelps, Arthur, Sir
Philosophy
Friends in Council — First Series
Helps, Arthur, Sir
Conduct of life
_Ellesmere_. Say it all over again, my dear Milverton: it is rather
hard. [Milverton did so, in nearly the same words.] I think I have
heard it all before. But you may have it as you please. I do not say
this irreverently, but the truth is, I am too old and too earthly to
enter upon these subjects. I think, however, that the view is a
stout-hearted one. It is somewhat in the same vein of thought that you
see in Carlyle’s works about the contempt of happiness. But in all these
cases, one is apt to think of the sage in “Rasselas,” who is very wise
about human misery till he loses his daughter. Your fly illustration has
something in it. Certainly when men talk big about what might have been
done for man, they omit to think what might be said, on similar grounds,
for each sentient creature in the universe. But here have we been
meandering off into origin of evil, and uses of great men, and wickedness
of writers, etc., whereas I meant to have said something about the essay.
How would you answer what Bacon maintains? “A mixture of a lie doth ever
add pleasure.”
_Milverton_. He is not speaking of the lies of social life, but of
self-deception. He goes on to class under that head “vain opinions,
flattering hopes, false valuations, imaginations as one would.” These
things are the sweetness of “the lie that sinketh in.” Many a man has a
kind of mental kaleidoscope, where the bits of broken glass are his own
merits and fortunes, and they fall into harmonious arrangements and
delight him—often most mischievously and to his ultimate detriment, but
they are a present pleasure.
_Ellesmere_. Well, I am going to be true in my pleasures: to take a long
walk alone. I have got a difficult case for an opinion, which I must go
and think over.
_Dunsford_. Shall we have another reading tomorrow?
_Milverton_. Yes, if you are both in the humour for it.
CHAPTER II.
AS the next day was fine, we agreed to have our reading in the same spot
that I have described before. There was scarcely any conversation worth
noting, until after Milverton had read us the following essay on
Conformity.
CONFORMITY.
The conformity of men is often a far poorer thing than that which
resembles it amongst the lower animals. The monkey imitates from
imitative skill and gamesomeness: the sheep is gregarious, having no
sufficient will to form an independent project of its own. But man often
loathes what he imitates, and conforms to what he knows to be wrong.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account