Friends in Council — First SeriesHelps, Arthur, Sir
Philosophy
Friends in Council — First Series
Helps, Arthur, Sir
Conduct of life
_Milverton_. There is one thing in my mind that may confirm your view.
I cannot but think that the enlarged view we have of the universe must in
some measure damp personal ambition. What is it to be a King, Sheik,
Tetrarch, or Emperor, over a bit of a little bit? Macbeth’s speech,
“we’d jump the life to come,” is a thing a man with modern lights,
however madly ambitious, would hardly utter.
_Dunsford_. Religious lights, Milverton.
_Milverton_. Of course not, if he had them; but I meant scientific
lights. Sway over our fellow-creatures, at any rate anything but mental
sway, has shrunk into less proportions.
_Ellesmere_. I have been looking over the essay. I think you may put in
somewhere—that that age would probably be the greatest in which there was
the least difference between great men and the people in general—when the
former were only neglected, not hunted down.
_Milverton_. Yes.
_Ellesmere_. You are rather lengthy here about the cruelties to be found
in history; but we are apt to forget these matters.
_Milverton_. They always press upon my mind.
_Dunsford_. And on mine. I do not like to read much of history for that
very reason. I get so sick at heart about it all.
_Milverton_. Ah, yes, history is a stupendous thing. To read it is like
looking at the stars; we turn away in awe and perplexity. Yet there is
some method running through the little affairs of man as through the
multitude of suns, seemingly to us as confused as routed armies in full
flight.
_Dunsford_. Some law of love.
_Ellesmere_. I am afraid it is not in the past alone that we should be
awestruck with horrors: we, who have a slave-trade still on earth. But,
to go back to the essay, I like what you say about the theory of
constructing the Christian character without geniality; only you do not
go far enough. You are afraid. People are for ever talking, especially
you philanthropical people, about making others happy. I do not know any
way so sure of making others happy as of being so oneself, to begin with.
I do not mean that people are to be self-absorbed; but they are to drink
in nature and life a little. From a genial, wisely-developed man good
things radiate; whereas you must allow, Milverton, that benevolent people
are very apt to be one-sided and fussy, and not of the sweetest temper if
others will not be good and happy in their way.
_Milverton_. That is really not fair. Of course, acid, small-minded
people carry their narrow notions and their acidity into their
benevolence. Benevolence is no abstract perfection. Men will express
their benevolence according to their other gifts or want of gifts. If it
is strong, it overcomes other things in the character which would be
hindrances to it; but it must speak in the language of the soul it is in.
_Ellesmere_. Come, let us go and see the pigs. I hear them grunting
over their dinners in the farmyard. I like to see creatures who can be
happy without a theory.
CHAPTER VI.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account