Froebel as a pioneer in modern psychologyMurray, E. R. (Elsie Riach)
Science
Froebel as a pioneer in modern psychology
Murray, E. R. (Elsie Riach)
Fröbel, Friedrich, 1782-1852; Psychology
“The nature of man, as man, is that he is self-conscious, and
this is stamped with distinctness enough to be observed in
the quite peculiar character of childish activity,[18] in
his impulse to busy himself self-actively, spontaneously: an
impulse which awakens simultaneously with mind, and which is
in harmony with feeling and perception. If this tendency to
spontaneous activity is fostered, man’s triune nature--energy,
emotion and intellect--is satisfied.”--_P., p. 21._
A realization of what Sir Oliver Lodge calls “the universal struggle for
self-manifestation and corporeal realization, which plays so large a part
in all activity,” underlies all that Froebel has to say of the progress
from unconscious activity to self-conscious volition. His view of the
Universe is exactly that tentatively suggested by Professor Lodge, viz.
that something akin to this universal struggle “is exhibited in a region
beyond and above what is ordinarily conceived of as ‘Nature.’ The process
of evolution can be regarded as the gradual unfolding of the Divine
Thought or Logos, throughout the universe, by the action of Spirit upon
matter.”
This takes us out of the region of psychology, but Froebel’s subject was
not psychology, _per se_, but child development, as a part of the whole
plan of evolution, man being the most highly developed of creatures.
The whole universe is an expression of the Divine, but man alone can
become conscious of his origin.
“All things are destined to reveal God in their external and
transient being.… It is the special destiny of man, as an
intelligent and rational being to become conscious of his
divine essence and to render this active, to reveal it in his
life, with self-determination and freedom.”--_E., p. 2._
“Made in the image of God,” meant to Froebel self-conscious and
self-determined. The relation of man to God is expressed by Froebel as
the relation of the thought to the thinker “_could the thought but become
conscious of itself_.” In a letter of 1843, he says:
“At the basis of the Kindergarten lies an idea which serves
alike for all the interstellar spaces, for all systems of the
sun; the fulfilment of the divine will and the manifestation
of the same. _In order to become such a manifestation
of the divine, man has first to attain the basis of
self-consciousness_; to which end serves the early culture of
the spirit of humanity in the world of childhood.”--_L., p.
133._
In a paper entitled “A Second Review of the Plays,” which really deals
chiefly with evolution, we read:
“We must see clearly the conditions of development in Nature
and then employ them in life. Thus only can we raise man upon
his own plane, that is, the spiritual plane, at least to such a
degree of perfection as is shown on their plane by the types of
Nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account