From Berlin to Bagdad and BabylonZahm, J. A. (John Augustine)
HistoryChristian
From Berlin to Bagdad and Babylon
Zahm, J. A. (John Augustine)
Middle East -- Civilization; Middle East -- Description and travel
The eminent doctor of the Church, St. John of Damascus, shows how near
he considers Islam to Christianity when, in his account of the creed
of Mohammed, he treats it as a heresy analogous to Arianism.[242]
Peter the Venerable, the illustrious Abbot of Cluny, the first one to
have a translation made of the Koran, was of a similar opinion, as is
evinced in his work against Mohammedanism--a work which treats not of
the paganism but of the heresy of the Saracens, as its title--_Adversus
Nefandam Hæresim sive Sectam Saracenorum_--conclusively indicates.[243]
In like manner Dante, who was almost as distinguished as a theologian
as he was as a poet, places Mohammed in hell not as a heathen but as a
sower of “scandal and schism.”[244]
Arius, by denying the divinity of Christ, had prepared the way for
Islam, which saw in the Son of God only a prophet who, as Moslems
subsequently claimed, was but the precursor of Mohammed. St. Jerome,
in his memorable words--_Igemuit totus orbis et Arianum se esse
miratus est_--the world uttered a sigh and was astonished to find
itself Arian--expressed the one-time prevalence of the errors of the
Alexandrine heresiarch. The grave dissensions in the churches of Asia
and Africa that followed close upon dissemination of the heresy of
Arius immensely assisted Islam in its lightning career of conquest.
For the divided and degenerate Christians of these two continents were
easily persuaded that Moslemism was but one of the various Christian
sects and not a new religion.
The followers of Mohammed were formerly the victims of calumny
on account of their alleged beliefs and practices. Now it is the
organization of Islam and the character of its religious services that
seem to give rise to the most misunderstandings.
Thus, according to many modern writers, the Sultan of Turkey is to
Islam what the Pope is to Christendom. Nothing, however, could be
farther from the truth. That the caliphate, whether of the Ottoman,
Ommiad, or Abbassid dynasties, is in no way comparable with the Papacy
is clearly evidenced by the fact that Islam has never in all its
history regarded the Caliph as its spiritual head.[245]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account