From Bondage to Liberty in Religion: A Spiritual AutobiographyAshley, George T. (George Thomas)
Religion
From Bondage to Liberty in Religion: A Spiritual Autobiography
Ashley, George T. (George Thomas)
Ashley, George T. (George Thomas), 1863-1952; Unitarianism; Unitarians -- Biography
Other questions now began to arise that were soon to materially affect
my church relations, without, however, any material change in my
fundamental theology. As before stated, my sole ambition in life was
to warn sinners to "flee from the wrath to come." To this one purpose
all other things must be made subordinate. For this one purpose I was
pursuing my studies in college that I might become the more efficient
in its accomplishment. Impressed as I was with the awful truth of
man's total depravity and natural alienation from God, and the
certainty of his eternal damnation in the never-ending flames, unless
he accepted fully, and followed implicitly the prescribed course which
I had been taught was the only means of escape, I felt that "Woe is me,
if I preach not the gospel." I felt that any deflection on my part,
from the full performance of my duty in this particular, up to the full
extent of my power and opportunity, would not only entail eternal
torments upon all who might have been thus saved thru my efforts, but
would also detract from my own eternal glory in heaven in exactly the
same ratio.
I began to look upon the church as being at most but a means, or agency
to this end; the channel thru which I might work to accomplish this
central purpose. Leaving other churches out of consideration, as not
being germane to the purpose of this narrative, while yet in school I
had become more fully informed as to the fundamental theology of the
Methodist Church; and somewhat to my surprise, I found there was no
substantial difference between it and the Baptist Church, to which I
belonged. They both appealed to the same infallible revelation; both
taught the same doctrine of the fall of man, total depravity and
inherited sin; both taught the same doctrines concerning the
personality and character of Christ, and the vicarious atonement in his
death; the same doctrines concerning heaven and hell; and the same
doctrines of salvation by repentance, faith in Jesus Christ, and
regeneration by the Holy Spirit. I perceived that the only substantial
difference between the two was purely one of ecclesiastical
organization and polity. As before noted, the Baptist Church did not
hold that either baptism or church membership was necessary to
salvation; but that "salvation" was first necessary before one was
scripturally entitled to either baptism or church membership. It was
also freely admitted that a truly repentant and converted Methodist was
just as truly "saved" and as sure of heaven as any Baptist,--and that
there were many such there could be no doubt,--true members of the
kingdom of God and the Church Universal; true heirs of glory and fit
subjects for the heavenly kingdom,--yet not fit for membership in the
earthly church, admittedly imperfect at its best, solely because they
had not been dipped under the water, an ordinance admitted to be
secondary, and wholly unnecessary to the main object!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account