From the Black Mountain to Waziristan: Being an account of the border countries and the more turbulent of the tribes controlled by the north-west frontier province, and of our military relations with them in the pastWylly, H. C. (Harold Carmichael)
History
From the Black Mountain to Waziristan: Being an account of the border countries and the more turbulent of the tribes controlled by the north-west frontier province, and of our military relations with them in the past
The Orakzais thereupon retired to their present holdings, while the
Bangash have ever since occupied the Miranzai Valley. Historically,
however, it is more than probable that the Orakzais are of an ancient
Indian stock, and that in process of time successive emigrations from
the west have brought to them an infusion of Turkish blood.
These tribesmen are wiry-looking mountaineers, but they are not such
fine men physically, their reputation for courage does not stand so
high, nor are they as formidable as their northern neighbours, the
Afridis, while they are prone to be influenced by fanaticism to a far
greater extent. Their mountains are barren, and they themselves are
often ragged, poverty-stricken and underfed in appearance,
distinguishable from their neighbours—and, incidentally, wholly
_indistinguishable_ when skirmishing on their hillsides—by reason of the
peculiar pearl-grey tint of their dress, dyed from an earth found in the
Tirah hills. Their chief source of wealth lies in their flocks and
herds, and they do a considerable trade with Peshawar, especially in the
_mazarai_, or dwarf palm, which is cut during August and September, and
which has a certain commercial value for the manufacture of ropes, grass
sandals, bed-strings, nets, matting, baskets and grain-bins. Many of the
Orakzais are weavers by trade.
Of their moral character the usual contradictory evidence is
forthcoming. It was against the Orakzais that Macgregor brought the
indictment already quoted, that “there is no doubt that, like other
Pathans, they would not shrink from any falsehood, however atrocious, to
gain an end. Money would buy their services for the foulest deed;
cruelty of the most revolting kind would mark their actions to a wounded
or helpless foe, as much as cowardice would stamp them against
determined resistance.” And Oliver, after saying that, if not better,
they are probably not much worse than their neighbours in the Pathan
qualities of deceit, avarice and cruelty, reminds us that “it must not
be forgotten that they have been embittered by centuries of bitter
religious feuds and the influence of fanatical teachers; they have never
had a government of any decent sort, its place being supplied by
superstition; and they do not understand our theory of tolerance or
non-interference.” On the other hand, it is said that as soldiers they
are, in general, quiet, well-behaved and intelligent, responding easily
to discipline. At home they are given, even more than other Pathans, to
internecine feuds, due to the fact that part of the tribe are Samil and
Sunnis, and part Gar and Shiahs. Their fighting men number, all told,
some 24,000, all tolerably well armed.
[Sidenote: Their Moral Character]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account