From the Caves and Jungles of HindostanBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
From the Caves and Jungles of Hindostan
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna), 1831-1891; India -- Description and travel; India -- Religion
There are at least three different styles in the architecture of
these pillars. Some of them are grooved in spirals, gradually and
imperceptibly changing from round to sixteen sided, then octagonal and
square. Others, plain for the first third of their height, gradually
finished under the ceiling by a most elaborate display of ornamentation,
which reminds one of the Corinthian style. The third with a square
plinth and semi-circular friezes. Taking it all in all, they made a most
original and graceful picture. Mr. Y----, an architect by profession,
assured us that he never saw anything more striking. He said he could
not imagine by the aid of what instruments the ancient builders could
accomplish such wonders.
The construction of the Bagh caves, as well as of all the cave temples
of India, whose history is lost in the darkness of time, is ascribed by
the European archeologists to the Buddhists, and by the native tradition
to the Pandu brothers. Indian paleography protests in every one of its
new discoveries against the hasty conclusions of the Orientalists.
And much may be said against the intervention of Buddhists in this
particular case. But I shall indicate only one particular. The theory
which declares that all the cave temples of India are of Buddhist origin
is wrong. The Orientalists may insist as much as they choose on the
hypothesis that the Buddhists became again idol-worshipers; it will
explain nothing, and contradicts the history of both Buddhists and
Brahmans. The Brahmans began persecuting and banishing the Buddhists
precisely because they had begun a crusade against idol-worship. The
few Buddhist communities who remained in India and deserted the pure,
though, maybe--for a shallow observer--somewhat atheistic teachings
of Gautama Siddhartha, never joined Brahmanism, but coalesced with the
Jainas, and gradually became absorbed in them. Then why not suppose that
if, amongst hundreds of Brahmanical gods, we find one statue of Buddha,
it only shows that the masses of half-converts to Buddhism added this
new god to the ancient Brahmanical temple. This would be much more
sensible than to think that the Buddhists of the two centuries before
and after the beginning of the Christian era dared to fill their temples
with idols, in defiance of the spirit of the reformer Gau-tama. The
figures of Buddha are easily discerned in the swarm of heathen gods;
their position is always the same, and the palm of its right hand is
always turned upwards, blessing the worshipers with two fingers. We
examined almost every remarkable vihara of the so-called Buddhist
temples, and never met with one statue of Buddha which could not have
been added in a later epoch than the construction of the temple; it does
not matter whether it was a year or a thousand years later. Not being
perfectly self-confident in this matter, we always took the opinion of
Mr. Y----, who, as I said before, was an experienced architect; and he
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account