From the Caves and Jungles of HindostanBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
From the Caves and Jungles of Hindostan
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna), 1831-1891; India -- Description and travel; India -- Religion
invariably came to the conclusion that the Brahmanical idols formed a
harmonic and genuine part of the whole, pillars, decorations, and
the general style of the temple; whereas the statue of Buddha was an
additional and discordant patch. Out of thirty or forty caves of Ellora,
all filled with idols, there is only one, the one called the Temple
of the Tri-Lokas, which contains nothing but statues of Buddha, and
of Ananda, his favourite disciple. Of course, in this case it would be
perfectly right to think it is a Buddhist vihara.
Most probably, some of the Russian archeologists will protest against
the opinions I maintain, that is to say, the opinions of the Hindu
archeologists, and will treat me as an ignoramus, outraging science. In
self-defence, and in order to show how unstable a ground to base one's
opinions upon are the conclusions even of such a great authority as Mr.
Fergusson, I must mention the following instance. This great architect,
but very mediocre archeologist, proclaimed at the very beginning of
his scientific career that "all the cave temples of Kanara, without
exception, were built between the fifth and the tenth centuries." This
theory became generally accepted, when suddenly Dr. Bird found a brass
plate in a certain Kanara monument, called a tope. The plate announced
in pure and distinct Sanskrit that this tope was erected as a homage
to the old temple, at the beginning of 245 of the Hindu astronomical
(Samvat) era. According to Prinsep and Dr. Stevenson, this date
coincides with 189 A.D., and so it clearly settles the question of when
the tope was built. But the question of the antiquity of the temple
itself still remains open, though the inscription states that it was
an old temple in 189 A.D., and contradicts the above-quoted opinion of
Fergusson. However, this important discovery failed to shake Fergusson's
equanimity. For him, ancient inscriptions are of no importance, because,
as he says, "the antiquity of ruins must not be fixed on the basis
of inscriptions, but on the basis of certain architectural canons and
rules," discovered by Mr. Fergusson in person. Fiat hypothesis, ruat
coelum!
And now I shall return to my narrative.
Straight before the entrance a door leads to another hall, which is
oblong, with hexagonal pillars and niches, containing statues in a
tolerable state of preservation; goddesses ten feet and gods nine feet
high. After this hall there is a room with an altar, which is a regular
hexagon, having sides each three feet long, and protected by a cupola
cut in the rock. Nobody was admitted here, except the initiates of the
mysteries of the adytum. All round this room there are about twenty
priests' cells. Absorbed in the examination of the altar, we did not
notice the absence of the colonel, till we heard his loud voice in the
distance calling to us:
"I have found a secret passage.... Come along, let us find where it
leads to!"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account