From the Earth to the moon; and, round the moonVerne, Jules
Science
From the Earth to the moon; and, round the moon
Verne, Jules
Manned space flight -- Fiction; Moon -- Fiction; Science fiction; Space flight to the moon -- Fiction; Space ships -- Fiction
“My dear major,” replied Barbicane, “before discussing its weight
permit me to enumerate some of the marvels which our ancestors have
achieved in this respect. I don’t mean to pretend that the science of
gunnery has not advanced, but it is as well to bear in mind that during
the middle ages they obtained results more surprising, I will venture
to say, than ours. For instance, during the siege of Constantinople by
Mahomet II., in 1453, stone shot of 1,900 pounds weight were employed.
At Malta, in the time of the knights, there was a gun of the fortress
of St. Elmo which threw a projectile weighing 2,500 pounds. And, now,
what is the extent of what we have seen ourselves? Armstrong guns
discharging shot of 500 pounds, and the Rodman guns projectiles of half
a ton! It seems, then, that if projectiles have gained in range, they
have lost far more in weight. Now, if we turn our efforts in that
direction, we ought to arrive, with the progress on science, at ten
times the weight of the shot of Mahomet II. and the Knights of Malta.”
“Clearly,” replied the major; “but what metal do you calculate upon
employing?”
“Simply cast iron,” said General Morgan.
“But,” interrupted the major, “since the weight of a shot is
proportionate to its volume, an iron ball of nine feet in diameter
would be of tremendous weight.”
“Yes, if it were solid, not if it were hollow.”
“Hollow? then it would be a shell?”
“Yes, a shell,” replied Barbicane; “decidely it must be. A solid shot
of 108 inches would weigh more than 200,000 pounds, a weight evidently
far too great. Still, as we must reserve a certain stability for our
projectile, I propose to give it a weight of 20,000 pounds.”
“What, then, will be the thickness of the sides?” asked the major.
“If we follow the usual proportion,” replied Morgan, “a diameter of 108
inches would require sides of two feet thickness, or less.”
“That would be too much,” replied Barbicane; “for you will observe that
the question is not that of a shot intended to pierce an iron plate; it
will suffice to give it sides strong enough to resist the pressure of
the gas. The problem, therefore, is this—What thickness ought a
cast-iron shell to have in order not to weight more than 20,000 pounds?
Our clever secretary will soon enlighten us upon this point.”
“Nothing easier.” replied the worthy secretary of the committee; and,
rapidly tracing a few algebraical formulae upon paper, among which _n_2
and _x_2 frequently appeared, he presently said:
“The sides will require a thickness of less than two inches.”
“Will that be enough?” asked the major doubtfully.
“Clearly not!” replied the president.
“What is to be done, then?” said Elphinstone, with a puzzled air.
“Employ another metal instead of iron.”
“Copper?” said Morgan.
“No! that would be too heavy. I have better than that to offer.”
“What then?” asked the major.
“Aluminum!” replied Barbicane.
“Aluminum?” cried his three colleagues in chorus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account