Lüshun (China) -- History -- Siege, 1904-1905; Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905
To many it may seem strange that from a hostile community of military
clans there has sprung in less than half a century a nation instinct
with the most fervid patriotism. Like many other “miracles” in Japan,
this is a natural phenomenon, and was visible in Scotland as far back
as the days of the Stuarts. Whatever its origin there is no gainsaying
the patriotism. It is strong and relentless as the sea, and has
carried the Japanese army over many bloody leagues.
His endurance is not less remarkable than his courage. He can march
far, work hard, and fight like a Trojan on a handful of rice, a few
slices of the root of the lotus and a pickled plum. He never grumbles
at “fatigue” work. The word “grouse” has no place in the soldier’s
vocabulary. He will pull a gun through the mire, make a road over the
swamp, and drag a heavily-laden cart as cheerfully as he will charge a
trench filled with riflemen.
Another advantage the Japanese army can claim. It is well officered.
The men to whom are entrusted not merely brigades but regiments and
companies may be relied upon to show the finest qualities that the
profession of arms can develop. Yet if I was asked to state in one
sentence why the Japanese have been victorious in every battle on sea
and land, I would say: “It is because every Japanese goes into action
determined to die, and it is therefore the other man who dies.”
How did the Russians regard the Japanese? What estimate did they form
of the fighting qualities of their enemy? That the Russians had made
careful study of the Japanese army is manifest from confidential papers
found upon prisoners. These documents, which will be seen in the
appendix to this volume, are the work of an experienced soldier. The
technical parts dealing with the constitution, training, discipline,
and methods of fighting are instructive. But, for the moment, it is
the deductions and generalisations that interest. How inaccurate and
misleading these are may be judged from one or two examples.
[Illustration: Japanese Marching Order: Front View.]
[Illustration: Japanese Marching Order: Back View.]
“The Japanese infantry never attack with the bayonet; they believe that
against the modern rifle bayonet attacks are impracticable, and that
the issue must be decided by powder and shot.... They do not recognise
the necessity of continuing the fight within reach of the bayonet.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account