Lüshun (China) -- History -- Siege, 1904-1905; Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905
There remains the fourth justification for surrender--a justification
that may be pleaded by humanitarians, but not by those who believe that
the first duty of a commander in the field is toward the living and
not toward the dead and dying. The condition of the sick and wounded
in Port Arthur was undoubtedly deplorable. Yet it was not so terrible
as the first Russian statements led us to believe. In his despatch to
the Czar, dated December 28th, General Stoessel wrote:--“The position
of the fortress is becoming very painful, our principal enemies are
scurvy, which is mowing down men, and eleven-inch shells which know
no obstacle, and against which there is no protection. There remain
only a few who have not been attacked by scurvy. We have taken all
possible measures, but the disease is spreading. The passive endurance
of the enemy’s bombardment, the eleven-inch shells, the impossibility
of replying for want of ammunition, the outbreak of scurvy, and
the loss of a mass of officers--all these causes diminish daily the
capabilities of the defence, and the tale of losses of higher officers
is an indication of the enormous losses we have sustained.” At the
conference which arranged the terms of surrender, Count Ballaschoff,
chief of the Red Cross Society, stated that in the hospitals were over
twenty thousand sick and wounded, for whom there were neither drugs nor
bandages. That number was afterwards reduced to fifteen thousand. At
the same time we were told that when communication with the North was
broken the garrison in Port Arthur--exclusive of naval men--numbered
35,000; that between fifteen and sixteen thousand had died during the
siege, and that there remained only between nine and ten thousand
combatants, of whom five thousand were effective. We were also informed
that fifty per cent. of the officers had been killed, and that only
twenty-eight officers had passed through the ordeal unscathed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account