Lüshun (China) -- History -- Siege, 1904-1905; Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905
It is impossible to reconcile these statements with the ascertained
facts. Exclusive of those in hospital there actually surrendered 28,562
soldiers and naval men, not counting volunteers. They are accounted
for thus:--Generals, 8; field officers, 57; officers below field rank,
531; officers in civilian branches, 99; surgeons, 109; chaplains, 13;
non-commissioned officers and men, 22,434--total for the army, 23,251.
Admirals, 4; captains of ships, 100; lieutenants, 200; chaplains, 7;
sailors and marines, 4,500; civilian officers of the navy, 500--total
for the navy, 5,311. In addition to these were 3,645 men described
as non-combatants, all of whom had either served in the army or
were liable to be called to the colours, and most of whom had been
volunteers during the siege. With few exceptions these 32,207 men were
able to walk twenty miles to the railway outside Port Arthur, and to
endure the exposure of a winter without bivouack without any apparent
suffering. Moreover, when it became known that they were to be deported
to Japan four thousand patients quitted the hospitals, fearing, as one
of their own officers did not scruple to say to me, that they might be
released and sent back to the war!
These figures--even more than the appearance of the prisoners and their
capacity to perform a long march--show that the conditions of the
garrison was not so terrible as it was represented by the Russians.
Among the sick and wounded the suffering was great--as it must always
be in an invested and bombarded city--and General Stoessel may have
succumbed to the imperative calls of humanity. History will pronounce
judgment upon his action, and will, doubtless, say that it was at least
premature. Meanwhile, the impression must prevail that the last days
of Port Arthur were less glorious than the first, and that it was the
General, and not the garrison that surrendered.
Chapter XLIV
JAPANESE GUNS AND HORSES.
In all respects, save one, the Japanese field guns are inferior to the
Russian. They have a shorter range; their projectiles are lighter; they
are less mobile, and they are not quick firers. Their one claim to
superiority is the high explosive used in the common shell. The battle
of the Yalu is, perhaps, responsible for the extravagant estimate
of the Japanese artillery. But it must be borne in mind that in the
bombardment of April 30th it was howitzers, and not field guns, that
wrought havoc with the Russian positions, and that on May 1st the
Russian guns fired only six shots.
[Illustration: Horse-shoeing extraordinary.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account