Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith), 1874-1936 -- Criticism and interpretation
Of all futures, the future of literature and its professors is the least
predictable. We have all, so to speak, turned a corner since August,
1914, but we have not all turned the same way. Chesterton would seem to
have felt the great change early in the war. Soon he will break his
silence, and we shall know whether we have amongst us a giant with
strength renewed or a querulous Nonconformist Crusader, agreeing with no
man, while claiming to speak for every man. Early in the course of this
study a distinction was drawn between Christians and Crusaders.
Chesterton has been throughout his career essentially a Crusader. He set
out to put wrongs to rights in the same spirit; in much the same spirit,
too, he incidentally chivvied about the Jews he met in his path, just as
the Crusaders had done. He fought for the Holy Sepulchre, and gained it.
Like the Crusaders, he professed orthodoxy, and, like them, fell
between several "orthodoxies." He shared their visions and their faith,
so far as they had any. But one thing is true of all Crusaders, they are
not necessarily Christians. And there is that about Chesterton which
sometimes makes me wonder whether, after all, he is not "a child of the
French Revolution" in a sense he himself does not suspect. He has cursed
the barren fig-tree of modern religious movements. But there comes a
suspicion that he denies too much; that from between those supple
sentences and those too plausible arguments one may catch a glimpse of
the features of a mocking spirit. Chesterton has given us the keenest
enjoyment, and he has provoked thought, even in the silly atheist. We
all owe him gratitude, but no two readers of his works are likely to
agree as to the causes of their gratitude. That, in itself, is a
tribute. Wherefore let it be understood that in writing this study I
have been speaking entirely for myself, and if any man think me
misguided, inappreciative, hypercritical, frivolous, or anything else,
why, he is welcome.
FOOTNOTE:
[3] _All Things Considered._
BIBLIOGRAPHY (TO JULY, 1915)
WORKS
1900. _Greybeards at Play._ Brimley Johnson. Cheaper edition, 1902.
_The Wild Knight._ Grant Richards. Second edition,
Brimley Johnson, 1905. Enlarged edition, Dent, 1914.
1901. _The Defendant._ Brimley Johnson. Second enlarged edition,
1902. Cheap edition, in Dent's Wayfarer's Library, 1914.
1902. _Twelve Types._ A. L. Humphreys. Partly reprinted as _Five
Types_, 1910, same publisher. Cheap edition, 1911.
_G. F. Watts._ Duckworth. In Popular Library of Art. Reissued
at higher price, 1914.
1903. _Robert Browning._ In English Men of Letters Series. Macmillan.
1904. _The Patriotic Idea._ In _England a Nation_. Edited by Lucien
Oldershaw. Brimley Johnson.
_The Napoleon of Notting Hill._ John Lane. With 7 full-page
illustrations by W. Graham Robertson and a Map of the Seat
of War.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account