was not the careless, hearty, whole-souled enjoyment of an experienced
girl; it was not the natural, indifferent, imperial queening it of an
acknowledged monarch: but something that caught hold of the hem of the
garment of them all. It was they with the sheen damped off. So it was
not imposing. I could pick you up a dozen girls straight along, right
out of the pantries and the butteries, right up from the washing-tubs
and the sewing-machines, who should be abundantly able to "hoe their
row" with them anywhere. In short, I was extremely disappointed. I
expected to see the high fashion, the very birth and breeding, the
cream cheese of the country, and it was skim-milk. If that is birth,
one can do quite as well without being born at all. Occasionally you
would see a girl with gentle blood in her veins, whether it were
butcher-blood or banker-blood, but she only made the prevailing
plebsiness more striking. Now I maintain that a woman ought to be very
handsome or very clever, or else she ought to go to work and do
something. Beauty is of itself a divine gift and adequate. "Beauty is
its own excuse for being" anywhere. It ought not to be fenced in or
monopolized, any more than a statue or a mountain. It ought to be free
and common, a benediction to all weary wayfarers. It can never be
profaned; for it veils itself from the unappreciative eye, and shines
only upon its worshippers. So a clever woman, whether she be a painter
or a teacher or a dress-maker,--if she really has an object in life, a
career, she is safe. She is a power. She commands a realm. She owns
a world. She is bringing things to bear. Let her alone. But it is a
very dangerous and a very melancholy thing common women to be "lying on
their oars" long at a time. Some of these were, I suppose, what
Winthrop calls "business-women, fighting their way out of vulgarity
into style." The process is rather uninteresting, but the result may
be glorious. Yet a good many of them were good honest, kind, common
girls, only demoralized by long lying around in a waiting posture. It
had taken the fire and sparkle out of them. They were not in a healthy
state. They were degraded, contracted, flaccid. They did not hold
themselves high. They knew that in a market-point of view there was a
frightful glut of women. The usually small ratio of men was unusually
diminished by the absence of those who gone to the war, and of those
who, as was currently reported, were ashamed that they had not gone. A
few available men had it all their own way; the women were on the
lookout for them, instead of being themselves looked out for. They
talked about "gentlemen," and being "companionable to GEN-tlemen," and
who was "fascinating to GEN-tlemen," till the "grand old name became a
nuisance. There was an under-current of unsated coquetry. I don't
suppose they were any sillier than the rest of us; but when our
silliness is mixed in with housekeeping and sewing and teaching and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account