Ton ephexês logon hapanta poiêsometha zêtountes hyper
hôn ex archês prouthemetha, posai te kai tines eisin hai
tês physeôs dynameis kai ti poiein ergon hekastê
pephyken. ergon de dêlonoti kalô to gegonos êdê kai
sympeplê||rômenon hypo tês energeias autôn, hoion to 7
haima, tên sarka, to neuron; energeian de tên drastikên
onomazô kinêsin kai tên tautês aitian dynamin. epei gar
en tô to sition haima gignesthai pathêtikê men hê tou
sitiou, drastikê d' hê tês phlebos gignetai kinêsis,
hôsautôs de kan tô metapherein ta kôla kinei men ho mys,
kineitai de ta osta, tên men tês phlebos kai tôn myôn
kinêsin energeian einai phêmi, tên de tôn sitiôn te kai
tôn ostôn symptôma te kai pathêma; ta men gar
alloioutai, ta de pheretai. tên men oun energeian
enchôrei kalein kai ergon tês physeôs, hoion tên pepsin,
tên anadosin, tên haimatôsin, ou mên to g' ergon ex
hapantos energeian; hê gar toi sarx ergon men esti tês
physeôs, ou mên energeia ge. dêlon oun, hôs thateron men
tôn onomatôn dichôs legetai, thateron d' ou.
III
It appears to me, then, that the vein, as well as each of the other
parts, functions in such and such a way according to the manner in
which _the four qualities_[27] are mixed. There are, however, a
considerable number of not undistinguished men--philosophers and
physicians--who refer action to the Warm and the Cold, and who
subordinate to these, as passive, the Dry and the Moist; Aristotle, in
fact, was the first who attempted to bring back the causes of the
various special activities to these principles, and he was followed
later by the Stoic school. These latter, of course, could logically
make active principles of the Warm and Cold, since they refer the
change of the elements themselves into one another to certain
_diffusions_ and _condensations_.[28] This does not hold of Aristotle,
however; seeing that he employed the four qualities to explain the
genesis of the elements, he ought properly to have also referred the
causes of all the special activities to these. How is it that he uses
the four qualities in his book "On Genesis and Destruction," whilst in
his "Meteorology," his "Problems," and many other works he uses the
two only? Of course, if anyone were to maintain that in the case of
animals and plants the Warm and Cold are _more_ active, the Dry and
Moist _less_ so, he might perhaps have even Hippocrates on his side;
but if he were to say that this happens in all cases, he would, I
imagine, lack support, not merely from Hippocrates, but even from
Aristotle himself--if, at least, Aristotle chose to remember what he
himself taught us in his work "On Genesis and Destruction," not as a
matter of simple statement, but with an accompanying demonstration. I
have, however, also investigated these questions, in so far as they
are of value to a physician, in my work "On Temperaments."
III
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account