Galileo Galilei and the Roman Curia: From Authentic SourcesGebler, Karl von
Religion
Galileo Galilei and the Roman Curia: From Authentic Sources
Gebler, Karl von
Astronomers -- Italy -- Biography; Catholic Church. Curia romana; Galilei, Galileo, 1564-1642; Religion and science -- History
And whereas a book appeared here recently, printed last year
at Florence, the title of which shows that you were the
author, this title being: “Dialogue of Galileo Galilei on the
Two Principal Systems of the World, the Ptolemaic and the
Copernican”; and whereas the Holy Congregation was afterwards
informed that through the publication of the said book, the
false opinion of the motion of the earth and the stability
of the sun was daily gaining ground; the said book was taken
into careful consideration, and in it there was discovered a
patent violation of the aforesaid injunction that had been
imposed upon you, for in this book you have defended the said
opinion previously condemned and to your face declared to be
so, although in the said book you strive by various devices
to produce the impression that you leave it undecided, and in
express terms as probable: which however is a most grievous
error, as an opinion can in no wise be probable which has been
declared and defined to be contrary to Divine Scripture:
Therefore by our order you were cited before this Holy Office,
where, being examined upon your oath, you acknowledged the book
to be written and published by you. You confessed that you
began to write the said book about ten or twelve years ago,
after the command had been imposed upon you as above; that you
requested licence to print it, without however intimating to
those who granted you this licence that you had been commanded
not to hold, defend, or teach in any way whatever the doctrine
in question.
You likewise confessed that the writing of the said book is in
various places drawn up in such a form that the reader might
fancy that the arguments brought forward on the false side
are rather calculated by their cogency to compel conviction
than to be easy of refutation; excusing yourself for having
fallen into an error, as you alleged, so foreign to your
intention, by the fact that you had written in dialogue, and
by the natural complacency that every man feels in regard to
his own subtleties, and in showing himself more clever than
the generality of men, in devising, even on behalf of false
propositions, ingenious and plausible arguments.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account