Galileo Galilei and the Roman Curia: From Authentic SourcesGebler, Karl von
Religion
Galileo Galilei and the Roman Curia: From Authentic Sources
Gebler, Karl von
Astronomers -- Italy -- Biography; Catholic Church. Curia romana; Galilei, Galileo, 1564-1642; Religion and science -- History
During his last stay at Rome, at the suggestion of Cardinal Orsini, he
had written a treatise on the tides in the form of a letter to that
dignitary, dated January 8th,[160] in which he expressed his firm
conviction, erroneously as we now know, that this phenomenon could
only be explained on the theory of the double motion of the earth. He
represented it as an important confirmation of the truth of it. In May,
1618, he sent a copy of this treatise to the Archduke Leopold of Austria,
who was friendly to him, and was a brother of the Grand Duchess. But as
since it was written the decree of March 5th had been issued, which only
permitted discussion of the subject as a hypothesis, Galileo thought it
advisable to add a sort of accompaniment to his treatise, in which he
took the utmost pains to comply with the conditions imposed by the Church
on her dutiful and orthodox son. He wrote:—
“With this I send a treatise on the causes of the tides, which
I wrote rather more than two years ago at the suggestion of
his Eminence Cardinal Orsini, at Rome, at the time when the
theologians were thinking of prohibiting Copernicus’s book and
the doctrine enounced therein of the motion of the earth, which
I then held to be true, until it pleased those gentlemen to
prohibit the work, and to declare that opinion to be false and
contrary to Scripture. Now, knowing as I do, that it behoves
us to obey the decisions of the authorities, and to believe
them, since they are guided by a higher insight than any to
which my humble mind can of itself attain, I consider this
treatise which I send you merely to be a poetical conceit, or
a dream, and desire that your Highness may take it as such,
inasmuch as it is based on the double motion of the earth, and
indeed contains one of the arguments which I have adduced in
confirmation of it. But even poets sometimes attach a value to
one or other of their fantasies, and I likewise attach some
value to this fancy of mine. Now, having written the treatise,
and having shown it to the Cardinal above-mentioned, and a few
others, I have also let a few exalted personages have copies,
in order that in case any one not belonging to our Church
should try to appropriate my curious fancy, as has happened
to me with many of my discoveries, these personages, being
above all suspicion, may be able to bear witness that it was
I who first dreamed of this chimera. What I now send is but
a fugitive performance; it was written in haste, and in the
expectation that the work of Copernicus would not be condemned
as erroneous eighty years after its publication. I had intended
at my convenience, and in the quiet, to have gone more
particularly into this subject, to have added more proofs, to
have arranged the whole anew, and to have put it into a better
form. But a voice from heaven has aroused me, and dissolved all
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account