Gallio : $b or, The tyranny of science — John Shaqi
Gallio : $b or, The tyranny of scienceSullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
Philosophy
Gallio : $b or, The tyranny of science
Sullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
Science; Science -- Philosophy
GALLIO
OR
THE TYRANNY
OF
SCIENCE
GALLIO
OR
The Tyranny of Science
BY
J. W. N. SULLIVAN
[Illustration]
E. P. DUTTON & CO. :: NEW YORK
GALLIO, OR THE TYRANNY OF SCIENCE
COPYRIGHT 1928 BY E. P. DUTTON & COMPANY
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED :: PRINTED IN U.S.A.
GALLIO
GALLIO
OR
THE TYRANNY OF SCIENCE
1
There can be no doubt that the prestige of science has greatly
increased of recent times. In the days when Dickens wrote _The Mudfog
Papers_ the man of science, to the general reading public, was a purely
comic figure. After the man of science had knocked the bottom out of
the Victorian universe with his theory of Natural Selection he inspired
the respect we accord to whatever is both powerful and sinister. He was
observed, warily and acutely, as an enemy. This reaction was perfectly
justified, for science, as expounded to the populace by such men as
Huxley and Tyndall, deprived life of all that had hitherto made it
worth living. The gravamen of their offence was not that they made man
an integral part of the animal kingdom, but that they presented him
with a universe that was entirely purposeless. Such a doctrine would
probably come as a shock even to a disillusioned and emaciated Eastern
Sage, but to the men of the Victorian age, almost every one of them
brought up in an orthodox Christian household and filled with that
belief in a wise Providence that comes of great material prosperity,
it was nothing short of an outrage. Even the men of science themselves
found their great discovery more than a little disconcerting. Nobody
who reads them can fail to detect something strained, something
occasionally almost frenzied, in their insistence on the duty of
intellectual honesty. These men are, half the time, shouting aloud
in order to hearten themselves. They were quite consciously martyrs
to the truth. This is true, at any rate, of such men as Huxley and
Clifford. There were many men of science, of course, who were not
sufficiently alive to live in a universe of any description. Outside,
their laboratories they had no perceptible existence. Many of them died
simple Christians. But to all interested in such matters it became
evident that the goal of science was the detailed explanation of man
as the accidental outcome of “matter and motion”. Since the arguments
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account