Gandhi and AnarchySankaran Nair, C. (Chettur), Sir
History
Gandhi and Anarchy
Sankaran Nair, C. (Chettur), Sir
Gandhi, Mahatma, 1869-1948 -- Political and social views; India -- Politics and government -- 1919-1947
"If you believe that because Italians hold Italy, the Italian nation is
happy, you are groping in darkness. What substantial gain did Italy
obtain after the withdrawal of the Austrian troops? The gain is only
nominal. You do not want therefore to reproduce the same conditions in
India. India to gain her independence can fight like Italy only when
she has arms and in order to gain her independence India has to be
armed and to arm India on a large scale is to Europeanise it. Then her
condition will be just as pitiable as that of Europe. This means in
short, that India must accept European civilisation ... but the fact is
that the Indian nation will not adopt arms and it is well that she does
not."
She must not therefore use force to fight the English.
But what is it she has to do. She must obtain Swaraj or Home Rule by
'soul force'. What is it?:--
"When we are slaves we think that the whole universe is enslaved.
Because we are in an abject condition, we think that the whole of India
is in that condition. As a matter of fact, it is not so, but it is as
well to impute our slavery to the whole of India. But if we bear in
mind the above fact we can see that if we become free, India is free.
And in this thought you have definition of 'swaraj.' It is 'swaraj'
when we earn to rule ourselves. It is therefore in the palm of our
hands. Do not consider this 'swaraj' to be like a dream. Hence there is
no idea of sitting still. The 'swaraj' that I wish to picture before
you and me is such that, after we have once realised it, we will
endeavour to the end of our lifetime to persuade others to do likewise.
But such 'swaraj' has to be experienced by each one for himself."
The assumption made by a few persons that Mr. Gandhi is only condemning
parliamentary government for its inutility is unfounded. The extracts
already given might lend some colour to that view. But such is not the
fact. In England Parliamentary government is denounced by certain
persons on the ground that it will always be under the influence of a
capitalist Press and therefore unable to redress the evils from which
the people of the country other than the capitalists are suffering. Mr.
Gandhi's objection is not based on any such ground; he is against not
only Parliamentary Government but practically against any Government in
any form as is apparent from the extracts given above. The doctrine that
Governments have very little to do with our happiness which depends upon
self-control or 'soul force' has many advocates, but to deduce it as a
doctrine from the alleged failure of Parliamentary Government in England
is ludicrous. I shall not stop here to justify Parliamentary government
which has justified itself by its results; it is only ignorance of the
work that has been done which is responsible for opinions like those to
which Mr. Gandhi has given expression.
Towards the end of the book he says:--
Before I leave you, I will take the liberty of repeating:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account