Garden Design and Architects' Gardens: Two reviews, illustrated, to show, by actual examples from British gardens, that clipping and aligning trees to make them 'harmonise' with architecture is barbarous, needless, and inartisticRobinson, W. (William)
General
Garden Design and Architects' Gardens: Two reviews, illustrated, to show, by actual examples from British gardens, that clipping and aligning trees to make them 'harmonise' with architecture is barbarous, needless, and inartistic
Robinson, W. (William)
Blomfield, Reginald Theodore, Sir, 1856-1942. Formal garden in England; Landscape gardening; Sedding, John D. (John Dando), 1838-1891. Garden-craft old and new
"Landscapist" is used throughout the book as a term of contempt. The
authors take some of the worst work that is possible, and condemn all in
the same opprobrious terms, as if we were to condemn the noble art of
the builders of the Parthenon on seeing a "jerry" building in London.
They may be quite sure that there _is_ a true and beautiful art of
landscape gardening, notwithstanding their denunciations, and it is none
the less real because there is no smug definition of it that pleases the
minds of men who declare that it does not exist.
The horticulturist and the gardener are indispensable, _but they
should work under control_, and they stand in the same relation to the
designer as the artist's colourman does to the painter, or, perhaps it
would be fairer to say, as the builder and his workmen stand to the
architect.
What modesty!
The men whose business it is to design gardens are heartily abused. How
very graceful it would be on the part of one of them to write an essay
telling architects how to build, and showing that to build well it is
not necessary to know anything about the inhabitants or uses of a house!
"IMPROVING" BATTERSEA PARK!
Perhaps after the cemetery, the ugliest things in the fair land of
France are the ugly old lines of clipped Limes which deface many French
towns. Readers who have not seen these things can have no idea of their
abominable hardness and ugliness, the natural form of the trees being
destroyed, and deformed and hideous trees resulting from constant
clipping. These gouty lines of clipped trees are praised as "noble
walls" "pure and broad" in design, while
Such a place, for instance, as Battersea Park is like a bad piece of
architecture, full of details which stultify each other. The only good
point in it is the one avenue, and this leads to nowhere. If this park
had been planted out with groves and avenues of Limes, like the
boulevard at Avallon, or the squares at Vernon, or even like the east
side of Hyde Park between the Achilles statue and the Marble Arch, at
least one definite effect would have been reached. There might have
been shady walks, and noble walls of trees, instead of the spasmodic
futility of Battersea Park.
Battersea Park, like many others, may be capable of improvement; but
here we have men who want to supplant its lawns, grassy playgrounds, and
pretty retired gardens with Lime trees like those of a French town, and
lines and squares of trees like those at Vernon, which I once saw half
bare of leaves long before the summer was over!
[Illustration: _Avenue in Paris. Showing that even in a land of clipped
trees clipping is not essential_]
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account